An analysis of the Trump/Harris debate

[mark francis]

Trump Delivers Haymakers While Kamala Lectures Voters During ABC Debate

Debate analysis: Trump’s assertiveness vs. Harris’s scripted, preachy responses, contrasting media praise with public reaction.

amac.us

​

Trump Delivers Haymakers While Kamala Lectures Voters During ABC Debate​

As Trump took control of the debate, the ABC moderators stepped in to put their thumb on the scale for Harris, following up virtually all of Trump’s statements with bogus “fact checks” while allowing Harris to lie with impunity. But even this may have backfired on the Harris campaign. Trump proved himself capable of taking on both Harris and the moderators, while Harris looked weak by comparison.

In the end, Harris may have proven to be precisely what Democrat strategist James Carville warned about back in March – “too many preachy females dominating the culture of the Democratic Party.” Americans want a leader, not a lecturer-in-chief. On that front, Trump came out clearly ahead.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Kamala played Rope-A-Dope with Shitshiz pants and lured him into ranting about his stupid rallies and cat eating Haitians. He was disorganized and looked like a tired old fool after every exchange. Kamala smiled and used her facial expressions better than any politician we have ever seen. All Trump did was lie and rant nonsense about how Israel would not exist unless he was elected.

 

[pjmret]

Lololololololol
Zero credibility