Americans got message before September 11 attacks

[Paul Lasaro]

After the tragedy it has been written a lot about it. But do you know what was written BEFORE that? Now it is strange to read a warning that was published in the USA in 2000. It was written there – This was INEVITABLE. Even more – it was a script that came true with deterrent preciseness It was said in no uncertain terms – America from the point of view of legislation is unprotected internally until somebody will blow up most part of the town.

Americans got this message in July, 2000. It was written by a very popular American writer - Mario Puzo. Taking into consideration his popularity it could have been read in the White House and in other places. It’s strange that the popular author died just a year before and it is doubted whether it was written by the author himself.

Here is a precise quotation from the book "Omerta" Publish Date: July 04, 2000:
- „The greatest short-term danger was that terrorist organizations secretly financed and supported by a foreign power would smuggle a nuclear weapon into the United States and explode it in a large city. Probably Washington, D.C., or New York. This was inevitable. The proposed solution was the formation of task forces to use counterintelligence and then the utmost punitive measures against these terrorists and whoever backed them. It would require special laws that would abridge the rights of American citizens. The scenarios acknowledged the impossibility or these laws until somebody finally succeeded at blowing up a good portion of an American metropolis. Then the laws would pass easily. But until then, as one scenario airily remarked, “It was the luck of the draw”".

Mario Puzo died already in 1999, it is a year before this book was published. The situation became more uncertain when a writer’s specialist San Francisco Chronicle mentions several oddities connected with a book formation. Here is a link to the article.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/07/09/RV65681.DTL

It’s significant that these motives written before September 11 attacks are very similar to those which after the tragedy were mentioned by CIA ex-director George Tenet in his book „At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the CIA”, in the end of Chapter 11. More surprising is a fact that the USA had both - weakened internal security and external security. In his book, in Chapter 7 he clearly admits that the organization in the middle and at the end of the 90ties was on the border of bankruptcy. Nobody from administrative power and decision – making power did something to prevent the bankruptcy. Finances came into only AFTER September 11 attacks and his organization was fully ready to uptake these appropriations.

I do not want to make any theories of conspiracy out of this tragedy. However, by reading it, it seems that something had to happen so that

America would finally start to provide a real internal and external security. It happened. Like everybody could read it a year ago. Reasons and consequences are also shown precisely. Coincidence?

Have a nice day and be careful,
Paul Lasaro
www.paullasaro.com

 

[Mr. Shaman]

After the tragedy it has been written a lot about it. But do you know what was written BEFORE that? Now it is strange to read a warning that was published in the USA in 2000. It was written there – This was INEVITABLE. Even more – it was a script that came true with deterrent preciseness It was said in no uncertain terms – America from the point of view of legislation is unprotected internally until somebody will blow up most part of the town.

Richard Clarke tried...........​

"The terrorism briefing was delivered by Richard Clarke, a career bureaucrat who had served in the first Bush Administration and risen during the Clinton years to become the White House's point man on terrorism. As chair of the interagency Counter-Terrorism Security Group (CSG), Clarke was known as a bit of an obsessive—just the sort of person you want in a job of that kind. Since the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole in Yemen on Oct. 12, 2000—an attack that left 17 Americans dead—he had been working on an aggressive plan to take the fight to al-Qaeda. The result was a strategy paper that he had presented to Berger and the other national security "principals" on Dec. 20. But Berger and the principals decided to shelve the plan and let the next Administration take it up. With less than a month left in office, they did not think it appropriate to launch a major initiative against Osama bin Laden. "We would be handing [the Bush Administration] a war when they took office on Jan. 20," says a former senior Clinton aide. "That wasn't going to happen."

******

Hell.....The Clinton Admin probably "owed" one to the Bush Family....​

"Bush Senior went into Somalia with 20 thousand US troops in December, 1992 when he had been defeated in his re-election bid by Bill Clinton and was a lame-duck President. Why such a major overseas undertaking by an outgoing president was a question that perplexed many.​

******

Richard Clarke tried (cont.).........

"Berger had left the room by the time Clarke, using a Powerpoint presentation, outlined his thinking to Rice. A senior Bush Administration official denies being handed a formal plan to take the offensive against al-Qaeda, and says Clarke's materials merely dealt with whether the new Administration should take "a more active approach" to the terrorist group. (Rice declined to comment, but through a spokeswoman said she recalled no briefing at which Berger was present.) Other senior officials from both the Clinton and Bush administrations, however, say that Clarke had a set of proposals to "roll back" al-Qaeda. In fact, the heading on Slide 14 of the Powerpoint presentation reads, "Response to al Qaeda: Roll back." Clarke's proposals called for the "breakup" of al-Qaeda cells and the arrest of their personnel.

As the new Administration took office, Rice kept Clarke in his job as counterterrorism czar. In early February, he repeated to Vice President Dick Cheney the briefing he had given to Rice and Hadley. There are differing opinions on how seriously the Bush team took Clarke's warnings. Some members of the outgoing Administration got the sense that the Bush team thought the Clintonites had become obsessed with terrorism. "It was clear," says one, "that this was not the same priority to them that it was to us."

Some counterterrorism officials think there is another reason for the Bush Administration's dilatory response. Clarke's paper, says an official, "was a Clinton proposal." Keeping Clarke around was one thing; buying into the analysis of an Administration that the Bush team considered feckless and naive was quite another. So Rice instructed Clarke to initiate a new "policy review process" on the terrorism threat. Clarke dived into yet another round of meetings. And his proposals were nibbled nearly to death."

 

[Paul Lasaro]

""God told me to smite Osama bin Ladin, so I invaded Afghanistan. Then He told me to smite Saddam Hussein, so I invaded Iraq. Now he wants me to work on the Middle East problem..." - George W. Bush
---------------------------------------------------------

Bush just did black work before comes good boy - Obama.
I can't imigine world with Sadam Husein and nuclear bomb.

 

[Little-Acorn]

There were a hundred thousand stories written about enemy attacks, terrorist attacks, and all the rest of it, all before 9/11. All of them fictional.

It was inevitable that a few of them somewhere, would wind up matching what actually happened on 9/11/2001.

Too bad you weren't posting about it back then, to tell the rest of us in advance which one would actually happen, and when.

Could that be because you actually had no clue, any more than anyone else did before the event?

 

[Paul Lasaro]

Mario Puzo wasn't small storrietellers from thousands.