All ACORN office in Maryland are illegal?

Little-Acorn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
2,444
Location
San Diego, CA
It just keeps getting worse and worse for ACORN.

As always, these leftists cannot stand the light of day being shined on the things they do, exposing them for all to see.

Is there anything this bunch does that is NOT illegal?

(Cliclk on the URL for documents)

-----------------------------------

http://biggovernment.com/2009/09/15/exclusive-acorn-illegally-operating-in-maryland/

Exclusive: ACORN Illegally Operating in Maryland

by Mike Roman

Last week, we saw some pretty disturbing activities revealed in the undercover footage from ACORN Housing’s Baltimore office. By any measure of conduct, the actions of ACORN’s employees should never have happened. It turns out the actions shouldn’t have happened for another, very simple, reason: ACORN can’t legally operate in the state of Maryland.

According to the following documents, ACORN, Inc.–the parent organization of all things ACORN–forfeited its corporate charter in Maryland in 2006. ACORN Housing forfeited its corporate charter in 2008. Any ACORN office in the state of Maryland is potentially operating illegally.

The Maryland Attorney General has made noise about prosecuting the intrepid journalists who undercovered the misdeeds of ACORN employees. Perhaps he should focus instead on how ACORN was able to operate without a license in his state.
 
Werbung:
Maryland is a very corrupt state, that you can see for yourself.

It's run by Dems and they are putrid!
 
Werbung:
Do you disagree with the claim that ACORN is acting without charter in the state of Maryland? If so, would you please post the facts...I'm very interested in making certain we have all of the facts.

Facts... from a liberal... surely you jest. :D

Back to the subject:
The OP contains a link to a page where documents are shown from the Maryland state government, stating that ACORN has had their license revoked to do business in the state. Have the liberals gotten around to refuting that? Showing the documents are somehow false of forged (like Dan Rather's "proof" of Bush's supposed "AWOL" status)?

I didn't think so.
 
Back
Top