Reply to thread

Here you go with their so-called "agenda" again...there "agenda" has been pretty clearly laid out in this thread numerous times now...


In that "agenda" you will not find preemptive war as a policy, you will not find Iraq specifically targeted...


You will find:



You are simply attempting to redefine these points in hindsight to fall into your preconceived notions of what you think they mean to other people...that is absurd. 


I ask again...why in your mind does modernizing the military somehow equate to preconceived plans to invade Iraq?  Why does "challenge regimes hostile to our interests" suddenly mean preemptive attacks?  There is no basis for your argument in reality.


Back
Top