Irrelevant divertive digression, in blatantly intended ad hominem form, designed to both cover-up the fact that the pro-abortionist likely doesn't like the fact, or agree verbatum, that a person, a unique individual human being, begins to live at the moment of conception and is thereby endowed at that time with the human right to life. 
If you did accept the truth of it, and could handle it emotionally, you would have moved on by answering the question I posed: "what would that next bit be?" that you yourself wanted to "move on to".
Obviously, my reiteration verbatum of the thread's topical conclusion still bothers you, or you would have moved on as I requested.
Instead, you posted a meaningless diatribe that functions to derail that "next bit" you wanted to move on to.
I can only conclude that you are afraid to go there with me.
And the only people who are afraid to pursue what this means are ... pro-abortionists.
But, in the interest of staying on topic and deflecting your unjustified ad hominem attack, I reiterate: what is that next bit you want to move on to?
