Reply to thread

Your first two sentences are simply false.  You need to read the opening post in this thread to understand why they are false.


Your third sentence is irrelevant.


And your fourth and fifth sentences are also simply false.


The bottom line is that you are a pro-abortionist.


After you read the opening post in this thread, if you can present an accurate scientific refutation of the substance of the science of the opening post that rationally concludes the personhood of the newly conceived and thus the right to life of the newly conceived person, then please post it.


Otherwise, read backwards from here and you'll see all the ways in which all your pro-abortionist's sophistries have been easily and completely refuted.


Back
Top