If what you are saying is that you don't think that the foundational right to life exists at all, that it doesn't exist for anyone, then rationally, logically, you are simply posting here in the wrong thread.
You need to be posting in this thread: Realities of Rights.
If you can rationally, logically refute the existence of the foundational right to life in the "Realities of Rights" thread, then, thereby, you automatically win your point in this thread.
So far, however, the foundational right to life has not been seriously challenged, anywhere, let alone in the proper "Realities of Rights" thread.
So good luck to you on that one.
Indeed, if you pro-abortionists don't think that the right to life exists, then there is no common ground for a good debate in this thread.
Science unconjecturably presents the personhood of the newly conceived.
But the topical title of "A Conception's Right To Life" is rendered moot for those who don't think that the right to life is a foundational human right.
Exactly.
If the pro-abortionists cannot be consistent, saying as they sometimes do that the right to life applies for some but not for others, they indeed have thus yet to show a reasoned argument on that subset of this topic.
Those of us arguing from the pro-life and anti-abortion positions accept what modern humanity unconjecturably recognizes but may sometimes, sadly, take for granted or be bullied into self-denying: the existence of the foundational right to life.
The right to life is a given, an obvious reality, and this thread was created in conjunction with the obvious existence of the right to life.
But for those like you who don't think that right exists, a mere presentation of your disagreement of the existence of the right to life, followed by departing this thread for the "Realities of Rights" thread to deal with your denial of it there, is really the right thing to do ...
... And leave this thread for those of us who agree on the existence of the foundational right to life for all.
