Irrational, erroneous, and topically irrelvant.
The pro-abortion (self-described by their spin-moniker "pro-choice") contingent refuses to rationally and scientifically refute the scientific substance of the opening thread.
Both the pro-life and anti-abortion contigents have clearly, concisely, succinctly, appropriately and accurately presented and defended premises and conclusions of the opening thread.
The reality of the right to life of newly conceived people thereby remains unchallenged in this thread.
The pro-abortion contingent would really do well to stay on topic and present only accurately termed science presented in context.
Topic straying meanderings, digressive diversions, sophistry, character assassination, name-calling ad hominems, irrelevant mocking, and the like, the pro-abortion contingent's lastest resorts, score no points with those who pass this way and read this thread.
I didn't create this thread simply to have the pro-life and anti-abortion contigents walk all over the pro-abortion contigent so easily ... but that's exactly what's happened so far ... and it happens partially because the pro-life contigent refuses to stay heart-of-the-matter on scientific and relevant topic.
Those of the pro-abortion ilk who pass this way could really use some better representation in the debate.
Please, pro-abortionists, refer back to the opening thread and if you must attempt refutation, please do so on accurately presented scientific topic.
Thank you.
