Poor top gun. I really do believe that you want to make a rational argument in support of your postion, but what you don't seem to be willing to understand (or are too danged stupid to understand) is that unless you have the facts on your side, rational argument simply is not possible.
Sorry topgun, but your argument is a logical fallacy. It is an appeal to popularity. The facts don't change because a large number of people aren't aware of them. Since day one, the main ingredients of your argument have been gross misundersandings of biology and the law, and logical fallacy; primarily appeals to popularity and lets not forget, repeating "its legal" like a parrot on a stick.
Be careful with your appeal to the majority. Barely 17% of the population in the US wants to see abortion on demand continued. If you poll Americans and don't give them the option of abortion if the mother's life is in danger, you can get a majority in favor of abortion on demand. If you include the option of abortion if the mother's life is in danger, you get a clear majority in favor of heavily restricting abortion. If you include rape and incest, you are left with 17% favoring abortion on demand. The majority aren't with you topgun.
More logical fallacy. This one is an appeal to fear. Adhering to the Constitution and respecting the rights that it is supposed to protect does not equal a dictatorship. Your use of the word dictatorship is inaccurate and serves no purpose but to elicit fear. Dictatorships, in case you aren't aware, very often have written constitutions but disregard them if it suits their purposes. Our Constitution is very clear on human rights but you and yours are perfectly happy to disregard it if you favor denying a particular group their rights.
Again, logical fallacy. This time, appeal to popularity. The facts are what they are. If you can not make a rational argument in support of your postion, no amount of majority vote can make that decision rational. There was a time when the majority believed that blacks were not human beings but were property. The fact that the majority thought that way does not change the fact that they were wrong. The majority simply perpetrated a gross miscarriage of justice and denied an entire class their most basic human rights.
The abortion debate is the same. You seem to be claiming that if the majority want a thing, then it becomes right simply because the majority say so. Tell me, was slavery right because the majority said so?
This time you start off with appeal to ridicule fallacy. You can't point out any part of my argument that is religious in nature but claim that I am making a religous argument anyway and then switch gears into an appeal to belief fallacy. The fact that many people believe a thing that isn't true does not make it true. That fact only proves that many people are ignorant. And if you hold true to pattern, your reply to that fact will be an appeal to popularity fallacy suggesting that if enough people believe a thing that it becomes true.
Sure we could. But it wouldn't alter the fact. Change the word to cue ball and in order to be accurate the definition of cue ball must be human being. And here, your fallacy is that you beg the question. We all know that killing another human being is not a medical procedure. You beg the question and simply assume that the unborn is not a human being but nothing more than a growth to be removed. Until you can prove that they are someithing other than human beings, any attempt to portray them as something else is a logical fallacy.
Do you see a pattern developing here? Every argument you have put up so far is fallacious.
(continued)
