Reply to thread

Thank you.  I take that as a confession that you can't answer or refute the arguments that I gave.

You called a frozen zygote both dead and human and therefore protected by the constitution.  You never refuted that. Never.

 

You gave your three "points" again, but your "proof" of those points was inane idiocy full of contradictions.

Now your fall-back position simply reverts to pulling back from your "proof" and posting your original dogma again, and calling counter-arguments blatant lies and fantasy, etc. It is very clear to me that you understand that you can't refute my arguments, but I certainly don't expect you to admit it in this forum. It would be to your benefit to just go away to prevent further embarrassing your position.

Now it's your turn to explain how you can call a frozen zygote dead, but human, and expect that Black's dictionary shows that dead human zygotes have the same definition as a person in the constitution. Quit avoiding that question.  Now if you want to go ahead and call that a blatant lie, I will go back and re-post your statement, and show just who the blatant liar is.