When you are ignoring the basics of logic you are dripping wet with dogma.
What is amazing is that your logic is full of the faults you are trying to accuse me of. Sorry, it just doesn't work.
No. You are the one doing that. That is what makes your arguments so foolish. You called dead zygotes human. Then you quote the constitution with person = human, and then you come up with the foolish notion that the constitution protects dead humans. That argument is absolutely foolhardy.
Are you trying to say that frozen embryos are NOT equivalent to unborns alive and growing? They aren't. Period. Yet you call them both human.
I made my argument loud and clear. I can't help it if you are so opinionated that you have blinders on.
It's working fine for me. Here is a little experiment for you.
x + 2 = 3
x + 2 = 4
I would say they are two separate statements where x in the first relation has no connection with x in the second relation.
You would say the two statements together prove that
x = "some contradictory dogma that a person driven by obsession would make up"
Do you think that argument is absurd? That is exactly why your arguments are so absurd. You are trying to conjoin two things that have no relation. Once again a single blob of Deoxyribonucleic acid, frozen or not, is a chemical, and yet you call it a human in the same sense of the constitutional meaning.
What is so amazing about that statement is that you are the one doing all the emotional hand-wringing about Roe vs. Wade. You are obsessed and driven by that, that you try miserably to prove something by pseudo-logic and completely fail. And yet you call me dogmatic. What an absolute irony.
