Dr.Who
Well-Known Member
You are simply wrong. Most people who haven't read Roe v. Wade don't know that in it the justices (with reasoning so shakey that it has even been criticized by pro-abortionists) "created" two "rights" - first, the "right" to privacy, and then leveraged that to a "right" to abortion. I personally support the creation of a carefully delineated, uncorrupted right to privacy by constitutional amendment, but there is no such right in the constitution now.
Setting aside R v W...
The constitution is not a list of rights but instead is a list of limits on the fed to restrict our rights. Your right to privacy exist and is God given long before the constitution was written. The government can only infringe on your right to privacy, for example when it searches your home, when it first follows due process and gets a search warrant. If you did not have a right to privacy then it would not need to get the warrant.
More generally, you have the right to do absolutely anything at all until your right is restricted by the government for a compelling reason. The constitution limits how the government will restrict your rights and gives the gov various powers.