What is so wrong with anti-semitism

Stalin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
1,824
This site and many others, are full of anti-muslim rhetoric, insults and blatant ignorance..

The zionist settler project has proven to be a incompetent and vicious custodian of the levant.

The state of israel. as well as being a blasphemy, should be dismantled and a free and democratic palestine installed.

It is time that people got over the fallacious ruse of the antisemitic trope and call out the jews who support the
project

there a plenty of jews, probably/possibly a majority who are deeply disturbed and embarrassed by the antics of the
settler "war" cabinet..

i would like a coherent argument that explains precisely why antisemitism is bad..

after all..i am antiwar..


comrade stalin
 
Werbung:
How about antistalinism? Are you for or against that as well?
You sure were pretty fooled by Hitler for signing a nonaggression pact, weren't you?

Me, I liked Khruschev way more than Stalin.
 
Werbung:
without stalin, you would probably be speaking german, and if you are a jew, non-existent...

hitler's ideas found great favour with much of the us elite, whose factories in germany during ww2 never
stopped until bombed out of existence.

there is a historian. sean mcmeekin who has quite a differentc take on ww2

"...World War II endures in the popular imagination as a heroic struggle between good and evil, with villainous Hitler driving its events. But Hitler was not in power when the conflict erupted in Asia - and he was certainly dead before it ended. His armies did not fight in multiple theaters, his empire did not span the Eurasian continent, and he did not inherit any of the spoils of war. That central role belonged to Joseph Stalin. The Second World War was not Hitler’s war; it was Stalin’s war.

Drawing on ambitious new research in Soviet, European, and US archives, Stalin’s War revolutionizes our understanding of this global conflict by moving its epicenter to the east. Hitler’s genocidal ambition may have helped unleash Armageddon, but as McMeekin shows, the war which emerged in Europe in September 1939 was the one Stalin wanted, not Hitler. So, too, did the Pacific war of 1941-1945 fulfill Stalin’s goal of unleashing a devastating war of attrition between Japan and the “Anglo-Saxon” capitalist powers he viewed as his ultimate adversary.

McMeekin also reveals the extent to which Soviet Communism was rescued by the US and Britain’s self-defeating strategic moves, beginning with Lend-Lease aid, as American and British supply boards agreed almost blindly to every Soviet demand. Stalin’s war machine, McMeekin shows, was substantially reliant on American material, from warplanes, tanks, trucks, jeeps, motorcycles, fuel, ammunition, and explosives, to industrial inputs and technology transfer, to the foodstuffs which fed the Red Army.

This unreciprocated American generosity gave Stalin’s armies the mobile striking power to conquer most of Eurasia, from Berlin to Beijing, for Communism.

A groundbreaking reassessment of the Second World War, Stalin’s War is an essential book for anyone looking to understand the current world order..."



available at all good bookshops and public libraries not ruled by cold warriors..


khushchev was a ukrainian and part of the clique that gifted russian lands to ukraine, creating the need for the special
military operation to remove the fascist government of kiev from ancestral lands..


comrade stalin

donbass
 
Back
Top