What Does It Take To Be LGBT?

[David Jeffrey Spetch]

And again like the good propagandist, and fomentar of hate, you repeat the same false accusations without proof. Just how does one such as yourself expect any kind of "contest" when your ideology is based on a false ASSumption that all homosexuals are "obsessive compulsive liars deceivers and discriminator". As I pointed out before it is your obsession with the homosexual that really seems to be the problem. It has deprived you of rational thought, and the ability to even competently address the situation.

You really are quite sad. Tell you what. Instead of your usual irrational rant why not pick one subject, and let us see if that can be addressed. Your mish mash of angry accusations does not make for any form of intelligent discussion.

"Artwork" does not make for an argument. And one filled with hate does not make for anything "beautiful". Kind of like Mapplethorpe with his sadomasochistic acts, or Andre Serrano's "Piss Christ" "art".

Amazing since you show none.

More like the obsessive compulsive liars deceivers and discriminators homosexual activists factually prove to be. Such as for example crying wolf with such lies as a hater, a bigot, a homophobe and discriminator etc. towards any mighty fine human being for simply demonstrating the factual evidence which proves that marriage is about honouring the significance of the one sexual unity exclusively being responsible for our very existence which is quite obviously heterosexual unions. Sharing the fact that it is thanks to heterosexual unions we even exist, which is quite obviously a significance that places heterosexual unions exclusively above all other sexual unions worthy of being honoured with the distinction of marriage, with also sharing the fact that thousands of years of only heterosexual unions being honoured with marriage, since marriage was created, certainly doesn't qualify a person as a hater, a bigot, a homophobe or a discriminator no matter homosexual activists compulsive obsession to try and make their every lie and deception the issue because they are unable to contest with so much as a shred of validity what fact already so clearly reveals. It however certainly exemplifies how desperate homosexual activists are to try and make their obvious lies and deceptions the issue because they are unable to contest with so much as a shred of validity the very factual evidence which proves beyond any shadow of doubt that marriage is exclusively about honouring heterosexual unions along with the fact that they quite obviously refuse to accept the fact that homosexual unions do not equal heterosexual unions.

Your fine examples of deliberate ignorance certainly doesn't qualify me as a hater.

Thanks to heterosexual unions we even exist.

If it were up to homosexual unions to sustain the human race, we would have died off thousands of years ago for weakly being a race of sexually defective.

Which is the very factual evidence as displayed within the beautiful inspirational love filled artwork beginning this very thread that proves homosexual unions do not equal heterosexual unions.

I love and care about the well being and sanity of current and future generations, the well being of the future of the life on this planet which is why it is my pleasure to play a key role globally to share facts which reveal homosexual activists for the obsessive compulsive liars deceivers and even discriminators that they prove to be on the foundation of their every issue to do with their bias agenda I address to put an end to this modern day homosexual activist insanity manifestation as well rid society of the LGBT permanently and globally.

love

Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Hamilton Ontario Canada

 

[David Jeffrey Spetch]

Marriage is about property rights. It grew a religious connotation when the church grew a role in governance. The orientation aspect was just a matter of it not being a matter ever.

Marriage isn't between a man and his property or a woman and her property. When did a man or a woman ever marry their property?

As thousands of years since marriage was created only heterosexual unions being honoured with marriage reveals, marriage is about honouring the unity of the one sexual orientation to which we all owe our very existence which is quite obviously heterosexual unions.

I have noticed that homosexual activists abused the Supreme Court of Justice in the USA by attempting to make irrelevance to do with tradition the issue by claiming that marriage was once about trading goods or live stalk for wives but that eventually changed because women were being treated as property instead of equal human beings which was an obviously lie and I will explain how that is not anything more than a homosexual activist lie in this very paragraph. It is no lie that at one time goods and live stalk were being exchanged for wives but that was never what marriage was about because the fact remains that before and after goods and live stalk were being traded for wives, marriage was always about honouring the unity of the one sexual orientation to which we owe our very existence. Even when goods were being traded for wives, the marriage itself was always about honouring the unity of heterosexual couples as it always has been for thousands of years since marriage was created.

love

Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Hamilton Ontario Canada

 

[David Jeffrey Spetch]

What Does It Take To Be LGBT?

Well--mostly it takes an unrelenting need to talk about yourself and all the things that send a thrill up your leg ad infinitum.
Anyone who has walked the Earth for the past 4 decades--must know this.

As much as that is an interpretation it is a weak one considering the last four decades society has been bombarded by a bunch of factually revealed lies, deceptions and discrimination from LGBT / homosexuals and homosexual activists and all because LGBT / homosexuals and homosexual activists are the one who quite obviously refuse to accept what homosexuals are and refuse to accept heterosexuals are in the first place.

love

Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Hamiilton Ontario Canada

 

[dogtowner]

Marriage isn't between a man and his property or a woman and her property. When did a man or a woman ever marry their property?

You cannot choose to ignore words.
Property rights is what I said.
Rights do extend to the spouses themselves in the area of to have and hold forsaking all others.
But to the point marriage defines the disposition of property at the termination of the marriage either by death or divorce.
But you boys keep up your antics that you so enjoy.

 

[Johnny Tremain]

What don't LGBT proponents present an exposition on how sports will work when men who "think" they are women begin competing against women--and vice-versa. And what can possibly prevent rapists from claiming to "think they are women" and hanging out in women's restrooms?
Who can prove they do not "think" this?
A bag with a wig and some lipsticks & mascara?
Just sayin'.

 

[Johnny Tremain]

As much as that is an interpretation it is a weak one considering the last four decades society has been bombarded by a bunch of factually revealed lies, deceptions and discrimination from LGBT / homosexuals and homosexual activists and all because LGBT / homosexuals and homosexual activists are the one who quite obviously refuse to accept what homosexuals are and refuse to accept heterosexuals are in the first place.

love

Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Hamiilton Ontario Canada

Just as I paused whilst re-reading "Sinners In The Hands of an Angry God" by Jonathan Edwards--I came upon this.
Not at all sure what it says.
I feel a bit like that dangling spider...

 

[dogtowner]

What don't LGBT proponents present an exposition on how sports will work when men who "think" they are women begin competing against women--and vice-versa. And what can possibly prevent rapists from claiming to "think they are women" and hanging out in women's restrooms?
Who can prove they do not "think" this?
A bag with a wig and some lipsticks & mascara?
Just sayin'.

This decision by IOC is very troubling to me. These girls have worked hard, sacrificed much and now face the prospect of being rendered 2nd class by ringers who can't compete fairly.
Which sports reporters will gave the courage to at least put asterisk beside these frauds ?
We can.but hope.

 

[cashmcall]

WOW..

 

[Johnny Tremain]

This decision by IOC is very troubling to me. These girls have worked hard, sacrificed much and now face the prospect of being rendered 2nd class by ringers who can't compete fairly.
Which sports reporters will gave the courage to at least put asterisk beside these frauds ?
We can.but hope.

This is what happens when you accept insane behavior as the norm. When you have male genitals and think you are a female, should the rest of the world conform to your desires? Murderers enjoy torture and killing--they just "feel" like murderers. Where--do you draw the line--and you must--draw the line--somewhere.

THIS is the gift to the world of the US democrat-traitor party and other socialist movements which, if I recall correctly, caused over 100,000,000 to die violent deaths in the 20th century.

 

[samsara15]

This is what happens when you accept insane behavior as the norm. When you have male genitals and think you are a female, should the rest of the world conform to your desires? Murderers enjoy torture and killing--they just "feel" like murderers. Where--do you draw the line--and you must--draw the line--somewhere.

THIS is the gift to the world of the US democrat-traitor party and other socialist movements which, if I recall correctly, caused over 100,000,000 to die violent deaths in the 20th century.

the Ravings of a lunatic....

 

[Old_Trapper70]

THIS is the gift to the world of the US democrat-traitor party and other socialist movements which, if I recall correctly, caused over 100,000,000 to die violent deaths in the 20th century.

What are you referring to here? Anything in the real world?

 

[dogtowner]

What are you referring to here? Anything in the real world?

Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Tito etc.
100 m seems a bit much though.

 

[Old_Trapper70]

Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Tito etc.
100 m seems a bit much though.

None of which were socialists, or Democrats. All were communists, and State Capitalists, just as China is today.

 

[Johnny Tremain]

Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Tito etc.
100 m seems a bit much though.

You left out Hitler. Can't really pigeonhole him as "etc.".
100,000,000--is conservative.

 

[Johnny Tremain]

None of which were socialists, or Democrats. All were communists, and State Capitalists, just as China is today.

The enforcer of socialism--is ALWAYS communism.