Laugh like the stupid fool you are. The headline says: "Trump still beats Clinton, 43%-40%"
Problem is with lies like that is he didn't beat her in the first race. Now, read about the poll itself with this most unpopular President in the history of keeping track:
Then too, why don't you do some honest research, and find out who they would vote for if the vote were to be held today since it is neither Trump, nor Clinton. Read the last line in the article posted:
I must be missing a trick here as I'd be interested to know why sound minded people would waste money..... and indeed would want to put a poll out regarding options that don't exist for people that aren't running in an election that isn't taking place??
Why not put a poll out asking for possible Donkey runners and riders in the next race.....??
So was Trump, and yet he won. If the people had voted for an honest person, and one that had moral values, I have to wonder how much better off we would be.
I must be missing a trick here as I'd be interested to know why sound minded people would waste money..... and indeed would want to put a poll out regarding options that don't exist for people that aren't running in an election that isn't taking place??
Why not put a poll out asking for possible Donkey runners and riders in the next race.....??
Well WaPo holds the fact that she still loses till the second to last paragraph so they were trying to make other points. You don't always know the outcome of a polling you commission when you sign the contract.
Well WaPo holds the fact that she still loses till the second to last paragraph so they were trying to make other points. You don't always know the outcome of a polling you commission when you sign the contract.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.