1. Come and join our community by registering for free here and start discussing politics! HOP - the political discussion forum

US ambassador 'killed in Libya'. US consulate Benghazi stormed. 4 US officials "dead"

Discussion in 'World News' started by Peter Dow, Sep 12, 2012.

  1. pocketfullofshells Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 17, 2008
    Message Count:
    10,835
    Likes Received:
    119
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    land of 10,000 lakes and 2 senators again
    you think the Russians would have let that slide?
  2. Texas_tea Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,502
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Great State of TEXAS
    "Some people do not like Facts getting in the way" :)
  3. BigRob Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Message Count:
    6,913
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    USA
    No, but I don't think they had the warhead counts or delivery capabilities to really start a full on nuclear war at that time.
  4. pocketfullofshells Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 17, 2008
    Message Count:
    10,835
    Likes Received:
    119
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    land of 10,000 lakes and 2 senators again
    I don't recall, but I think there was enough for the fall out to pretty much end things...maybe still have people...life like we know it gone..
  5. Aus22 Active Member

    Member Since:
    May 22, 2008
    Message Count:
    779
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Russia was a major power eve then, I think they could have easily bomb South Korea. By the the time of the truce in Korea both major powers, Russia and America had got what they wanted out of Korea, Both ha pupett states. The problem is that both had release the emerging giant China.
  6. Gipper Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Message Count:
    5,770
    Likes Received:
    317
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Winter Wonderland
    But you failed to state SK is a first world nation with a powerful economy providing its people freedom and wonderful life style. NK is still a dirt poor shit hole offering its people only suffering and horror.

    Do you know why?

    Which superpower did a better job?
    Texas_tea likes this.
  7. Aus22 Active Member

    Member Since:
    May 22, 2008
    Message Count:
    779
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gipper, Yes I know South Korea developed faster because it embraced Capitalism with no restrictions unlike North Korea. I am not sure this proves much about Russia or the USA, Both states of Korea want unity .
  8. Texas_tea Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,502
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Great State of TEXAS
    Wow ...
    The kool-aid. Your killing me with this liberal BS. It says everything about the difference Russian and the US and the differences between north and south Korea. And, both states of Korea want "unity". Really? One wants Freedom and Liberties and the other wants insane communist control! They could not be more the polar opposites!

    North Korea at night

    111219-holiday-korea1-120p.photoblog900.jpg

    Liberal insanity .... Go Figure!
    Gipper likes this.
  9. Gipper Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Message Count:
    5,770
    Likes Received:
    317
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Winter Wonderland
    Come on Mate! WTF are you smoking?

    The difference between SK and NK don't prove much about Russia or the USA?????? REALLY?

    You unknowingly insulted millions of Americans with that foolish statement. America bleed deeply to keep SK free (similar to what we did to save your nation from the Japanese in WWII) and we have kept thousands of American boys in SK for decades to keep the peace...but apparently all this is lost on your kind...
    Cruella and Texas_tea like this.
  10. ThirdTerm Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 17, 2012
    Message Count:
    73
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    severely conservative
    South Korea did a better job than North Korea in adopting Western technologies as Samsung has become one of the largest cell phone manufacturers in the world since it copied Apple's iPhone through reverse engineering and North Korea should follow China's lead to become a benign Communist state and catch up with South Korea. But as long as economic sanctions are in place, North Korea is barred from importing certain sensitive technologies, which is the key obstacle to North Korea's future.
  11. PLC1 Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Message Count:
    8,345
    Likes Received:
    212
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    The Golden State
    This is my first time on this thread. It appears we're just a tad off the subject now, but anyway, here's an update to the original story. Apologies if someone already posted it. I didn't read the whole thread:

    Decrying attack, protesters overtake Islamist group's HQ in Benghazi



  12. Cruella Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Message Count:
    3,191
    Likes Received:
    512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    China is a benign communist country?
    Johnny Tremain and Texas_tea like this.
  13. Cruella Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Message Count:
    3,191
    Likes Received:
    512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's good. The first glimmer of hope I've seen out of that country. Only time will tell I guess. Benghazi was the jihad capital of the world. They sent their fighters into Iraq to kill Americans and Iraqis who were pro west.
  14. Aus22 Active Member

    Member Since:
    May 22, 2008
    Message Count:
    779
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gipper, Texas and Cruela. I have been to South Korea and while there is much material prosperity there are still problems. Koreans do not want to be an American pupett or a Chinese or Russian pupett. The Americans are not popular in South Korea anymore than any other foreign army. Even to suggest Australia saved Australia is factually incorrect. By the time the American arrived the Japanese had decided not to invade Australia. We are grateful for American help but do not want American bases here. Most countries want to be independent of foreign armies.
  15. Johnny Tremain Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 14, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,224
    Likes Received:
    187
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Tierra del Fuego
    Tell that to 400,000,000 aborted children--mostly girls. o_O
  16. Gipper Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Message Count:
    5,770
    Likes Received:
    317
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Winter Wonderland
    First, SK WANTS American soldiers on their soil because they fear commie invasion, if we leave. SK is not nor was it ever, a puppet state of the US, but NK is and has been a puppet state of China and USSR...you got that ONE thing right.

    Secondly, it is very likely you would be speaking Japanese or never been born because your ancestors were killed by Japanese, if not for the sacrifices of American boys. Had we not entered the war when we did, had FDR not pushed the Japanese into an intolerable situation leading to Pearl Harbor, or had we not pursued the Pacific war as aggressively and effectively as we did, Imperial Japan very likely overruns Aussieland just as they did all of SE Asia.

    Many Americans want ALL our troops to come home. I am among them. I think America should end this constant interventionist policy we have been following for decades. So, should the Chinese come knocking down your door and I am in charge, don't expect American help.
  17. Johnny Tremain Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 14, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,224
    Likes Received:
    187
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Tierra del Fuego



    Agreed--100%.
    Fortress America--with an astounding and massive offensive capability to deter even a smart-aleck remark from enemies. Like we did after WW2 and it worked out well.

    Weakness invites and virtually guarantees attack.
    Forbid it--Almighty God.

    The greatest enemy today is the democrat/socialist/communist/gay-only party.
    Either they--or the Nation--will be destroyed very soon.
  18. BigRob Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Message Count:
    6,913
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    USA
    It is not that you guys are really against having a US presence in Australia, you give the US good access to your bases -- but your government has to hedge between support of the US and its relationship with China (who is Australia's largest trading partner I believe).
  19. BigRob Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Message Count:
    6,913
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    USA
    I think bringing all our troops home would the single biggest mistake we could ever make -- and would end American hegemony in very short order.
  20. Cruella Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Message Count:
    3,191
    Likes Received:
    512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My first reaction is to bring them all home, but if we leave you know the Chinese and Russia will move in and take over. They already are there and they are just as much a threat to us as the middle east. It's a tough call.
    I do think that Israel must start making some contingency plans for vacating their people. That situation isn't going to turn out well.

Share This Page