Uh oh.. get ready to panic over global cooling

Australia did not have a recession but people here are still buying smaller cars, Fords close down here because it rely on larger cars but Toyota which makes smaller care is still going.
Whether it is caused by the higher price of gasoline or fear of pollution may be hard to prove here, but in other areas such as using insolation and solar energy bats there has been a huge increase.

Oil prices go up and down due to political events but overall it is falling
 
Werbung:
Look back at car buying patterns back in oil pricing spikes going back to the 70's and Ibelieve you will find that Australia did as America did which was to buy higher milage cars. There was no hysteria over CO2, just a very note worthy jump in gas prices.
 
Dialing Back the Alarm on Climate Change
A forthcoming report points lowers estimates on global warming


Later this month, a long-awaited event that last happened in 2007 will recur. Like a returning comet, it will be taken to portend ominous happenings. I refer to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) "fifth assessment report," part of which will be published on Sept. 27.

There have already been leaks from this 31-page document, which summarizes 1,914 pages of scientific discussion, but thanks to a senior climate scientist, I have had a glimpse of the key prediction at the heart of the document. The big news is that, for the first time since these reports started coming out in 1990, the new one dials back the alarm. It states that the temperature rise we can expect as a result of man-made emissions of carbon dioxide is lower than the IPPC thought in 2007.
 
Whether you belive in Global warming or not, Most people do and government inmost countries have passed legislation to reduce use of coal and oil. That why oil price will not rise in the long term and Solar energy is rising in price.
 
World's top climate scientists confess: Global warming is just QUARTER what we thought - and computers got the effects of greenhouse gases wrong

A leaked copy of the world’s most authoritative climate study reveals scientific forecasts of imminent doom were drastically wrong.


The Mail on Sunday has obtained the final draft of a report to be published later this month by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the ultimate watchdog whose massive, six-yearly ‘assessments’ are accepted by environmentalists, politicians and experts as the gospel of climate science. They are cited worldwide to justify swingeing fossil fuel taxes and subsidies for ‘renewable’ energy.

Yet the leaked report makes the extraordinary concession that over the past 15 years, recorded world temperatures have increased at only a quarter of the rate of IPCC claimed when it published its last assessment in 2007.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cts-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html#ixzz2fB33Q1Ny
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

So, here we have the leading globalist that all the wacko leftist use to justify their false global warming hoax to raise taxes and redistribute wealth, actually saying:

“Scientific forecasts of imminent doom were drastically wrong,”

Now, those of us who are capable of thinking for our selves have long since known this was nothing more than a government hoax used to justify higher taxes and wealth redistribution. We are the "global warming deniers" remember?

Yet, the wacko leftist are still jumping up and down and trying to promote this hoax ...... both in the MSM and even on this site!

Sheeples ..... Go Figure!



'The idea of producing a document of near-biblical infallibility is a misrepresentation of how science works.'
- Professor Myles Allen, the director of Oxford University’s Climate Research Network
 
That's just like we are finding out that biofuels add to global warming. Solar and wind can't make a dent on our energy needs. They are ugly, don't work half the time and are killing wildlife. Not much of a trade off.
 
That's just like we are finding out that biofuels add to global warming. Solar and wind can't make a dent on our energy needs. They are ugly, don't work half the time and are killing wildlife. Not much of a trade off.
Isn't that the MO for all wacko leftist environmentalist ideas and policies?
 
Isn't that the MO for all wacko leftist environmentalist ideas and policies?

I'm all for conservation and managing our resources wisely and responsibly, but putting these expensive, invasive, and damaging, mass produced ideas into laws and regulations before they've been fully studied is insane.
 
I'm all for conservation and managing our resources wisely and responsibly, but putting these expensive, invasive, and damaging, mass produced ideas into laws and regulations before they've been fully studied is insane.
I believe all true conservatives are "all for conservation and managing our resources wisely and responsibly" ...

Again, it's the wacko environmentalist that obviously do more damage with their policies and ideas.
 
Again, it's the wacko environmentalist that obviously do more damage with their policies and ideas.

Just like what they've done to the Calif. farmers. They've cut off their water supply to save some dumb bait fish you could grow in fish farm and then don't say a word about all the thousands of endangered birds being chewed up by the wind farms.
 
Just like what they've done to the Calif. farmers. They've cut off their water supply to save some dumb bait fish you could grow in fish farm and then don't say a word about all the thousands of endangered birds being chewed up by the wind farms.
Yep .... makes a lot of sense doesn't it?

Maybe there's another motive ....
 
That's just like we are finding out that biofuels add to global warming. Solar and wind can't make a dent on our energy needs. They are ugly, don't work half the time and are killing wildlife. Not much of a trade off.

Poachers kill more wildlife then all of solar, or wind. Hydropower created by dams kills off more fish to the point where in some areas salmon is almost extinct. Nuclear power has sickened, and killed, millions.

Want to get rid of them too?
 
Werbung:
Democrats and the evoinmenmtalist lie. George Bush was trying to restart the logging industry to help cut down California Forrest fires. But the EPA refused to allow it. Heres science proof what happens too many trees
Now what if you chop some of trees down to a gap? Then you cut down chance of a Forrest fire
 
Back
Top