Trump withdrawal from the Paris agreement.

Facts on Climate change are not in dispute in the wider sense. The world is warming. This will do great harm to many countries. Human activity is one of the causes .
Therefor human intervention could reduce this. Whether it is cause by CO2 is in dispute. Bu there is no evidence that reducing SO2 will cause any harm.
 
Werbung:
Cool! Thanks for the tip...(y)

And your point is that the USA leaving PCA will solve all this?

You're right it is but again are you saying the that the US leaving PCA will solve this?


How does it help the matter? My point isn't that the USA leaving will solve the problem, but then you seem to always miss the point I make.
 
Let's see some facts that CO2 makes any difference.


Why? You would only deny it is true just as you deny Trump is a fraud. CO2, SO2, evaporation from warming waters, nitrates in the ground water, all make a difference. However, since your god Trump says it is a hoax, well, it must be because for certain he only tells the truth.
 
The Pause is not in dispute. It is true that global warming stop in some countries for a few years. But over a long period most places are warming. Any survey of over 20years will show this, Even where a pause has taken place over the longer period the earth has warmed. There is evidence that global warming even at 1% has harmed certain areas like the Great Barrier Reef, What we can't say is when this global warming will harm other areas. All climate change is subject to pauses but overall most places are warming
 
The Pause is not in dispute. It is true that global warming stop in some countries for a few years. But over a long period most places are warming. Any survey of over 20years will show this, Even where a pause has taken place over the longer period the earth has warmed. There is evidence that global warming even at 1% has harmed certain areas like the Great Barrier Reef, What we can't say is when this global warming will harm other areas. All climate change is subject to pauses but overall most places are warming
No aussie, the pause is worldwide. Temps may be up or down locally but globally they have not changed. Dispite increased co2.
 
No aussie, the pause is worldwide. Temps may be up or down locally but globally they have not changed. Dispite increased co2.

I know I am not supposed to insult you, or criticize you for your ignorance, however, your examples of it are overwhelming. I said you hadn't even read the article you posted which you are showing to be true. If you had you would have seen where even your own source says the "pause" ended 10 years ago, and the question is will it return. Then too, your article makes this comment:

"They point out that the data sets continue to show significant warming trends when the trend length exceeds 16 years. This is an obvious point when looking at the rise in global temperature seen in the years prior to the 1998 El Nino event."

As to your question regarding CO2:

https://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-81/Intro/facts-sheet/GasKillingTrees.html

http://www.livescience.com/38219-oceans-acidifying-with-rising-co2.html

However, I have become quite used to your ignoring of facts, and reality, so perhaps I should not insult you for your ignorance since it is more common then I would like. Kind of like your acceptance of Trumps made up vocabulary.

Then too, even corporations like Exxon, and BP, know that global warming is true:

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/...onsensus-in-1982-with-in-house-climate-models
 
Last edited:
interesting article isn't it - the NYTimes ones back in 2015 are more concise but are basically the same reading - don't read the Rockefeller Family Fund and 350.org docs though!
You may want to read these as they are most of the source documents from the articles and law suits filed against Exxon...
http://cdn.exxonmobil.com/~/media/g..._peer_reviewed_publications_1980s_forward.pdf
http://corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/shareholder-archive/supporting-materials
The executive memos are published on the NYTimes site so you may want to lok at those as well. The documents are interesting reading, they pretty well fill in the history of modern climate science quite well. Much of the current debate on climate change was being debated in the same way, and often with the same uncertainties, back in 1977. Have you read Schneiderman etal's accusations? Its all good historical background and an interesting debate on the merits of free speech.
 
interesting article isn't it - the NYTimes ones back in 2015 are more concise but are basically the same reading - don't read the Rockefeller Family Fund and 350.org docs though!
You may want to read these as they are most of the source documents from the articles and law suits filed against Exxon...
http://cdn.exxonmobil.com/~/media/g..._peer_reviewed_publications_1980s_forward.pdf
http://corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/shareholder-archive/supporting-materials
The executive memos are published on the NYTimes site so you may want to lok at those as well. The documents are interesting reading, they pretty well fill in the history of modern climate science quite well. Much of the current debate on climate change was being debated in the same way, and often with the same uncertainties, back in 1977. Have you read Schneiderman etal's accusations? Its all good historical background and an interesting debate on the merits of free speech.


Not sure it was a debate, more like outright lying to deflect from the truth of the debate. And there are many today who accept the lie rather then the truth just as they accepted the lies of Trump.
 
Dogtowner. While most countries had a pause it did not occur the same time in each country. For example The Aric warmed early but while this was happening the Antarctica had a pause. Now Icebergs are melting in the Antarctica as well. Can you name any couple where temperatures have not generally risen in the last twenty years.
 
Werbung:
Dogtowner. While most countries had a pause it did not occur the same time in each country. For example The Aric warmed early but while this was happening the Antarctica had a pause. Now Icebergs are melting in the Antarctica as well. Can you name any couple where temperatures have not generally risen in the last twenty years.
Temps are a global mean average aussie. You are describing weather, not climate. The Pause is global sport. That's why they used to refer to this as global warming, global.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top