The Prison Industrial Complex

Werbung:
I do. We should be trying to re-integrate these people back into society.

That can all begin once the democrat-traitor party no longer needs to maintain and foster a permanent underclass, housed in concentration camps in urban areas and fed with food stamps to control a big voting-block. And denying any concept of education to that same underclass.

And all that begins with forever voting them out of office and preventing them from stealing elections.
 
Crime? It's time to end the War on Drugs, and de-criminalize them. And then we need to remove all the traitor Republicans from office.

Crime--is breaking the laws set by society.
Don't like them, support change.
Dont like that--then go to the nearest airport or seaport and leave the country.
You'll most likely find happiness--elsewhere.
 
The US government generally opposes real measures that would improve education, crime, among other things. However, the Republican party could be in on it, as much as the Democratic one is. For sure, we know the government can fight wars in Iraq, Vietnam, and Afghanistan, but it refuses to fight a war in the inner city. It refuses to fight it because it's more profitable to send people to prison.

We could also say the same about other things like medicine. It's not a conspiracy theory in the least bit.
 
Prisons, built for the sake of money, most definitely has an immoral tone to it for a lot of reasons:
1. It preys on a social problem without actually doing anything to solve it.
2. It leaves care and safety of prisoners (who are put there by the state) in the care of private owners, who are not as obligated the state to see that prisoners has rights
3. In a profit-seeking venture, the goal is to cut costs. Cutting costs could mean any number of bad things for criminals.

That being said, in a capitalist economy, this is something that can happen.
 
The US government generally opposes real measures that would improve education, crime, among other things. However, the Republican party could be in on it, as much as the Democratic one is. For sure, we know the government can fight wars in Iraq, Vietnam, and Afghanistan, but it refuses to fight a war in the inner city. It refuses to fight it because it's more profitable to send people to prison.

We could also say the same about other things like medicine. It's not a conspiracy theory in the least bit.

Doctors certainly protect each other, including incompetent doctors, and sometimes blackball 'problem patients'. Maybe medicine in the US is under control of a conspiracy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That can all begin once the democrat-traitor party no longer needs to maintain and foster a permanent underclass, housed in concentration camps in urban areas and fed with food stamps to control a big voting-block. And denying any concept of education to that same underclass.

And all that begins with forever voting them out of office and preventing them from stealing elections.

How is education denied to them? Isn't education everyone's personal decision? Are you saying the urban schools are bad on purpose?
 
It's like any self-perpetuating bureaucracy. These institutions may have been created with good intentions, but when there is money to be made, all bets are off.

I wouldn't say urban schools are bad on purpose. I'd say that they don't have the same funding. There are myriad other issues as well, one being that kids aren't safe at school.
 
It isn't just prisons built for money causing the problem. This whole complex has existed since 1970. Even if the prisons don't make an official profit, as with public prisons, the existence of them still provides law enforcement jobs.
 
It isn't just prisons built for money causing the problem. This whole complex has existed since 1970. Even if the prisons don't make an official profit, as with public prisons, the existence of them still provides law enforcement jobs.

Thus, "self perpetuating bureaucracy." They need prisoners to keep prisons going. So, they need criminals to make into prisoners. Someone has to (get paid to) round up those criminals, etc.
 
Thus, "self perpetuating bureaucracy." They need prisoners to keep prisons going. So, they need criminals to make into prisoners. Someone has to (get paid to) round up those criminals, etc.

Considering that fact, do people really want to end crime? Do they really want to end the drug war? A lot of places, Southwest Virginia being one (near my home) practically depends on prisons now, as coal mines are losing money.
 
Werbung:
Caging people isn't about crime, it is about money. Plain and simple. Crime is just used as the justification for doing it.
 
Back
Top