The second part read:
"If a law is made that controls human behavior by rules or restrictions but the law DOES NOT PROTECT INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, then its not a legitimate law."
The bit about absolutes would be a third part.
My actual words:
The first part is correct. I thought that must have been your point to begin with, and now you have clarified it.
Absolutes? Well, in physics there are absolutes. In human affairs, they're harder to find.
Nice try, though. Maybe with practice, you'll become more adept at twisting posts and creating straw men.