Poll: Who voted for Obama and why?

[OldTrapper]

Welcome to the mind of the low information type. As I posted earlier, they do not have the capability of forming an independent thought.

So far all you have spouted are right wing talking points without any evidence of independent thought. Perhaps you should end projecting your own weaknesses on others.

Thus, when some "liberal pundit" spouts spin and lies, the low information types parrot it word for word believing it to be the gospel and accuse independent thinking Americans of being uninformed.

An attempt to discuss facts that suggest a different more accurate view will yield no results because of their inability to form an independent thought and the discussion quickly becomes monotonous!

Sounds like you for certain. Such as when I mentioned Bush, and Operation Wide Receiver, your reaction was automatic like the mental robot you are. Over 400 guns were lost in Mexico under this program, and yet you do not think it relevant to the guns lost under Obama. And in spite of the fact that Darrell Issa, the Republican head of the investigation into Fast and Furious, said back in June he could find no connection between Obama, and Fast and furious, it would matter not to you since your right wing talking heads would never accept such a conclusion.

So, when speaking of "parrots" it is obvious you are looking in a mirror pointing at yourself.

 

[OldTrapper]

Welcome to the mind of the low information type. As I posted earlier, they do not have the capability of forming an independent thought.

So far you have presented nothing that resembles independent thought. Perhaps you should practice not projecting your own disabilities on to others.

Thus, when some "liberal pundit" spouts spin and lies, the low information types parrot it word for word believing it to be the gospel and accuse independent thinking Americans of being uninformed.

An attempt to discuss facts that suggest a different more accurate view will yield no results because of their inability to form an independent thought and the discussion quickly becomes monotonous!

People like you are quite predictable. Such as when I pointed out Bush, and Operation Wide Receiver which lost over 400 guns in Mexico, you immediately parroted the "blame Bush" response. You showed no tendency to what to discuss why they are similar, nor were you aware of the fact that last June Darrell Issa, who is the Republican leading the investigation into Fast and Furious, stated that he could find no link between Obama, and Fast and Furious. All you wanted to do was show your immense desire to please your masters.

 

[OldTrapper]

No idea as there is no paranoia "of gun confiscation" based on Fast & Furious.

There was/is outrage over coverups and gross incompetance but thats hardly the same.

There is legitimate concern over confiscation given legislation has been presented to do so.

Whatever you say.

http://www.examiner.com/article/atf-used-fast-and-furious-to-make-the-case-for-gun-regulations

 

[dogtowner]

Whatever you say.

http://www.examiner.com/article/atf-used-fast-and-furious-to-make-the-case-for-gun-regulations

Paranoia would suggest people took it seriously. ATF cant be the paranoid ones.

 

[dogtowner]

Actually I would prefer the words of one of the Founders, not Wiki. It obviously was not intended to be a platform for political speeches.

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2010/mayweb-only/29-42.0.html

In 2005, Time magazine selected Doug Coe as one of the 25 most influential evangelicals in the nation. Coe provides spiritual leadership for the Fellowship Foundation, the entity that organizes the National Prayer Breakfast. This event brings together political leaders from around the world during the first week of February for prayer and networking. Attended by every President since Dwight Eisenhower, the event is the pinnacle of many smaller meetings involving thousands of world leaders and volunteers.

they're saying the same thing. Its political always has been.

 

[Cruella]

Whatever you say.

http://www.examiner.com/article/atf-used-fast-and-furious-to-make-the-case-for-gun-regulations

How disgusting. That's like a fireman setting fires so he can work overtime.

Oh let's go out and break the law so we can use the results to get what we want. Unfortuantely, two of their own are dead because of it. Bass tards.

 

[OldTrapper]

Paranoia would suggest people took it seriously. ATF cant be the paranoid ones.

Well, the Republicans took it seriously enough to hold months of hearings on it. The right wing talk show pundits took it serious enough to use it as an example of the promotion of gun confiscation. The public took it serious enough to buy guns they had no need of.

 

[OldTrapper]

they're saying the same thing. Its political always has been.

Do you understand the difference between Prayer and networking", and political grandstanding?

 

[Texas_tea]

Well, the Republicans took it seriously enough to hold months of hearings on it.

As should have been ..... despite party affiliation.

The right wing talk show pundits took it serious enough to use it as an example of the promotion of gun confiscation.

Care to back up such a ridiculous statement?

The public took it serious enough to buy guns they had no need of.

What gives you the right to comment on why any American chooses to exercise their Constitutional Rights?

Socialist ..... Go Figure!

 

[dogtowner]

Well, the Republicans took it seriously enough to hold months of hearings on it. The right wing talk show pundits took it serious enough to use it as an example of the promotion of gun confiscation. The public took it serious enough to buy guns they had no need of.

no, people took it seriously because it was so poorly executed and that the effects of this incompetance cost american lives which was tried to cover up.

people are buying guns as dem leadership has done nothing to conceal their intentions. they did it before F&F and they still do it with gun ban legislation being submitted.

you need to study up your cause and effect.

 

[dogtowner]

Do you understand the difference between Prayer and networking", and political grandstanding?

yes, your mistaken opinion based on your blinders.

 

[OldTrapper]

no, people took it seriously because it was so poorly executed and that the effects of this incompetance cost american lives which was tried to cover up.

people are buying guns as dem leadership has done nothing to conceal their intentions. they did it before F&F and they still do it with gun ban legislation being submitted.

you need to study up your cause and effect.

Wonder what would have happened if the people knew the truth behind Operation Wide Receiver, and the guns lost there? That was truly covered up, and the right wing could care less.

As to gun legislation, you do understand that the Republicans are pretty much going along with the Dems as usual, right?

No, you need to study up on the paranoia created by the right wing political machine. We have enough privately owned guns in this country for every man, woman, and child. I have a dozen with 3000 rds. of ammunition. If one wants an example of "gun registration" all one would need to do is get a list of the members of the NRA, Gun Owners of America, and a few others.

 

[OldTrapper]

yes, your mistaken opinion based on your blinders.

Well, I actually read the articles posted unlike you. Perhaps that is why you cannot see the truth.

 

[Johnny Tremain]

Well you gave one to me on racist post,,,So.

Curious--
Blacks who vote for black candidates--are not racist.
Whites who vote for white candidates--are racist.