odd to see NYT dis Mandela

[Texas_tea]

I wonder Obama supports Hitlers ideas?

Concentration Camps/FEMA Camps come to mind ....

 

[Aus22]

SouthAfrica Was always a majority black country. The few whites who live there try to give all the rights to themselves. They had no right to South African land and assets
Unlike Hitler the Blacks did not persecute a race. It was Hitler who put the Aryan white race first

 

[Cruella]

SouthAfrica Was always a majority black country. The few whites who live there try to give all the rights to themselves. They had no right to South African land and assets
Unlike Hitler the Blacks did not persecute a race. It was Hitler who put the Aryan white race first

How was South Africa any different than Australia with their British colonization? The Dutch East India company was there with a colony in 1652.

 

[Texas_tea]

SouthAfrica Was always a majority black country. The few whites who live there try to give all the rights to themselves. They had no right to South African land and assets
Unlike Hitler the Blacks did not persecute a race. It was Hitler who put the Aryan white race first

So, now all whites around the world are guilty because of one LEFTIST maniac ......

And, they call whites racist ...

 

[Texas_tea]

Stunning Allegation About Sign Language Interpreter on Stage During Mandela Memorial: He’s a ‘Fake’

JOHANNESBURG (TheBlaze/AP) — A man who provided sign language interpretation on stage for Nelson Mandela’s memorial service, attended by scores of heads of state, was a “fake,” the national director of the Deaf Federation of South Africa said on Tuesday.

This is the same interpreter that is seen in the video at the 2012 African National Congress singing "Shoot the Boere"

Interesting to see Obama at this Commie Fest shaking hands with murderous dictators and standing on stage next to dictators that sing the praises of white genocide.

 

[steveox]

And he bowed down to the Chinese and Arabs

Then he Shook Castros hand

 

[Aus22]

How was South Africa any different than Australia with their British colonization? The Dutch East India company was there with a colony in 1652.

The Difference was that South Africa was a fairly developed country with farming. The whites were always a minority.
In Australia the native Aboriginals were hunters and gatherers and were small in number when the white man arrive. They did not use the whole country and soon the whites outnumber them. This was still not morally right and we have apologise for our treatment of the aboriginals , but we can not hand most of the land back.

 

[Texas_tea]

The Difference was that South Africa was a fairly developed country with farming. The whites were always a minority.
In Australia the native Aboriginals were hunters and gatherers and were small in number when the white man arrive. They did not use the whole country and soon the whites outnumber them. This was still not morally right and we have apologise for our treatment of the aboriginals , but we can not hand most of the land back.

WTF ...

 

[steveox]

That's the thing how to tame blacks in Africa. Whites who invade their country can tame them. Why didn't Napolean thought of that idea ruling Africa? He may very well might had controlled the whole continent

Napolean controlled the French empire could easily built ships sent over thousands of men invade Africa

 

[dogtowner]

That's the thing how to tame blacks in Africa. Whites who invade their country can tame them. Why didn't Napolean thought of that idea ruling Africa? He may very well might had controlled the whole continent

Napolean controlled the French empire could easily built ships sent over thousands of men invade Africa

not nearly badass enough

 

[Aus22]

The Problem was that Napolean was a limited human being, too arrogant and in the end a poor Commander. He even lost Eu0pe eventually. The only power that could have conquer Africa was the Roman Empire. But when they go to Egypt they treated the people they conquer well as Egypt became the bread basket of Europe..In the end you achieved more by negotiations than conquest.

 

[Texas_tea]

The Problem was that Napolean was a limited human being, too arrogant and in the end a poor Commander. He even lost Eu0pe eventually. The only power that could have conquer Africa was the Roman Empire. But when they go to Egypt they treated the people they conquer well as Egypt became the bread basket of Europe..In the end you achieved more by negotiations than conquest.

WTF ...

 

[steveox]

Well Caesar couldn't do it anyway. Cause Africans had equal type of weapons that roman empire had. Napoleon had guns and cannons that Africans only fight with shields and spears. Guns and cannons can blow away those stupid African tribes. Just like the Brits were no match against Zulu. So they surrendered.

 

[Jim415]

F*ck Mandela .... He was a Communist POS that supported the white genocide in South Africa .... was he a victim to the apartheid ... YES .... was he this hero they are making him out to be .... NO ... he was no different. Two wrongs DO NOT make a right!!!

I agree with everything you said Texas tea.

 

[Texas_tea]

I agree with everything you said Texas tea.

Logic is easy for all normal thinking citizens ....