Not again.

Werbung:
Boris Norris said:
These proud boys are getting victimised for holding a peaceful protest. It's those filthy democrats again.
www.cbsnews.com

Jan. 6 Proud Boys defendant who led law enforcement on manhunt sentenced to 10 years in prison

Prosecutors alleged Christopher Worrell went missing for weeks after his Jan. 6 conviction and later faked a drug overdose.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com
Click to expand...
Yes, history is repeating itself. George Soros and pals, using programmable voting machines Soros controlled, stole the 2004 election in Venezuela and now the corrupt government is violating the human rights of the political enemies being persecuted by the illegitimate fascists in power.
Likewise, Soros and pals supplied corrupted voting machines to steal the 2020 election in the US and now the illegitimate fascists in power are denying the human and civil rights of their enemies as they persecute and imprison them on beefed-up bogus charges by the hundreds.

World Report 2022: Venezuela | Human Rights Watch (hrw.org)
With Autocrats on the Defensive, Can Democrats Rise to the Occasion?
Kenneth Roth
Former Executive Director

The Nicolás Maduro government and its security forces are responsible for extrajudicial executions and short-term forced disappearances and have jailed opponents, prosecuted civilians in military courts, tortured detainees, and cracked down on protesters. They used a state of emergency implemented in response to Covid-19 as a pretext to intensify their control over the population. The lack of judicial independence contributed to impunity for these crimes. Judicial authorities have participated or been complicit in the abuses.
A United Nations Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) identified patterns of violations and crimes that were part of a widespread and systematic course of conduct that it concluded amounted to crimes against humanity. In November 2021, International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor Karim Khan announced his decision to open an investigation into possible crimes against humanity committed in Venezuela. ...


Prior to the negotiations, the government had made limited concessions, largely due to increased international pressure, including naming new National Electoral Council members and allowing the World Food Program (WFP) to deploy.
An independent EU electoral mission that monitored the November regional elections reported that political opponents remained arbitrarily disqualified from running for office, there had been unequal access to the media, and the lack of judicial independence and of respect for the rule of law had undermined the election’s impartiality and transparency.

Persistent concerns include brutal policing practices, abject prison conditions, impunity for human rights violations, and harassment of human rights defenders and independent media.
The exodus of Venezuelans fleeing repression and the humanitarian emergency represents the largest migration crisis in recent Latin American history. ...
Persecution of Political Opponents, Arrests, and Torture
The government has jailed political opponents and disqualified them from running for office. ...
 
mark francis said:
Yes, history is repeating itself. George Soros and pals, using programmable voting machines Soros controlled, stole the 2004 election in Venezuela and now the corrupt government is violating the human rights of the political enemies being persecuted by the illegitimate fascists in power.
Likewise, Soros and pals supplied corrupted voting machines to steal the 2020 election in the US and now the illegitimate fascists in power are denying the human and civil rights of their enemies as they persecute and imprison them on beefed-up bogus charges by the hundreds.

World Report 2022: Venezuela | Human Rights Watch (hrw.org)
With Autocrats on the Defensive, Can Democrats Rise to the Occasion?
Kenneth Roth
Former Executive Director

The Nicolás Maduro government and its security forces are responsible for extrajudicial executions and short-term forced disappearances and have jailed opponents, prosecuted civilians in military courts, tortured detainees, and cracked down on protesters. They used a state of emergency implemented in response to Covid-19 as a pretext to intensify their control over the population. The lack of judicial independence contributed to impunity for these crimes. Judicial authorities have participated or been complicit in the abuses.
A United Nations Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) identified patterns of violations and crimes that were part of a widespread and systematic course of conduct that it concluded amounted to crimes against humanity. In November 2021, International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor Karim Khan announced his decision to open an investigation into possible crimes against humanity committed in Venezuela. ...


Prior to the negotiations, the government had made limited concessions, largely due to increased international pressure, including naming new National Electoral Council members and allowing the World Food Program (WFP) to deploy.
An independent EU electoral mission that monitored the November regional elections reported that political opponents remained arbitrarily disqualified from running for office, there had been unequal access to the media, and the lack of judicial independence and of respect for the rule of law had undermined the election’s impartiality and transparency.

Persistent concerns include brutal policing practices, abject prison conditions, impunity for human rights violations, and harassment of human rights defenders and independent media.
The exodus of Venezuelans fleeing repression and the humanitarian emergency represents the largest migration crisis in recent Latin American history. ...
Persecution of Political Opponents, Arrests, and Torture
The government has jailed political opponents and disqualified them from running for office. ...
Click to expand...
Was there voter fraud? I never heard that before.

I hope they caught the villians.
 
Boris Norris said:
Was there voter fraud? I never heard that before.

I hope they caught the villians.
Click to expand...
US Voting Machines Made in Venezuela made for Election Fraud (caracol.com)

US Voting Machines Made in Venezuela made for Election Fraud​


CONCLUSION: Connect the Dots: The US Smartmatic voting system wasn’t designed in America but in communist Venezuela, first used by Dictator Hugo Chavez, sponsored by his government as co-owner, educated by Bitza state software. A mere 16 years ago. Designed and first deployed to defraud a recall election, claims CIA. Today, Venezuela is a failed nation whose people are trapped in a living hell, dying without food or medicine. This might not have happened if Smartmatic had not willfully cooperated in election fraud. Smartmatic was then deployed to America where it is now in the midst of apparent massive election fraud. So, given the machine’s origins, purpose, record, and abilities – What are the chances that Smartmatic did not help throw this election?
 
mark francis said:
Yes, history is repeating itself. George Soros and pals, using programmable voting machines Soros controlled, stole the 2004 election in Venezuela and now the corrupt government is violating the human rights of the political enemies being persecuted by the illegitimate fascists in power.
Likewise, Soros and pals supplied corrupted voting machines to steal the 2020 election in the US and now the illegitimate fascists in power are denying the human and civil rights of their enemies as they persecute and imprison them on beefed-up bogus charges by the hundreds.

World Report 2022: Venezuela | Human Rights Watch (hrw.org)
With Autocrats on the Defensive, Can Democrats Rise to the Occasion?
Kenneth Roth
Former Executive Director

The Nicolás Maduro government and its security forces are responsible for extrajudicial executions and short-term forced disappearances and have jailed opponents, prosecuted civilians in military courts, tortured detainees, and cracked down on protesters. They used a state of emergency implemented in response to Covid-19 as a pretext to intensify their control over the population. The lack of judicial independence contributed to impunity for these crimes. Judicial authorities have participated or been complicit in the abuses.
A United Nations Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) identified patterns of violations and crimes that were part of a widespread and systematic course of conduct that it concluded amounted to crimes against humanity. In November 2021, International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor Karim Khan announced his decision to open an investigation into possible crimes against humanity committed in Venezuela. ...


Prior to the negotiations, the government had made limited concessions, largely due to increased international pressure, including naming new National Electoral Council members and allowing the World Food Program (WFP) to deploy.
An independent EU electoral mission that monitored the November regional elections reported that political opponents remained arbitrarily disqualified from running for office, there had been unequal access to the media, and the lack of judicial independence and of respect for the rule of law had undermined the election’s impartiality and transparency.

Persistent concerns include brutal policing practices, abject prison conditions, impunity for human rights violations, and harassment of human rights defenders and independent media.
The exodus of Venezuelans fleeing repression and the humanitarian emergency represents the largest migration crisis in recent Latin American history. ...
Persecution of Political Opponents, Arrests, and Torture
The government has jailed political opponents and disqualified them from running for office. ...
Click to expand...
Boris hates the truth that every major democrat city is complaining about the 10 million who have entered the nation from all over the world with no money no job no place to sty no insurance sucking the life out of city budgets. using moneys that were meant to help our own people and committing crimes .Joe and Boris trying to blame republicans for this mess is absurdity insane .Its Joe and Harris fault.
 
mark francis said:
US Voting Machines Made in Venezuela made for Election Fraud (caracol.com)

US Voting Machines Made in Venezuela made for Election Fraud​


CONCLUSION: Connect the Dots: The US Smartmatic voting system wasn’t designed in America but in communist Venezuela, first used by Dictator Hugo Chavez, sponsored by his government as co-owner, educated by Bitza state software. A mere 16 years ago. Designed and first deployed to defraud a recall election, claims CIA. Today, Venezuela is a failed nation whose people are trapped in a living hell, dying without food or medicine. This might not have happened if Smartmatic had not willfully cooperated in election fraud. Smartmatic was then deployed to America where it is now in the midst of apparent massive election fraud. So, given the machine’s origins, purpose, record, and abilities – What are the chances that Smartmatic did not help throw this election?
Click to expand...
Sorry comrade. This is been well hashed and no fraud was found. You're pissing against the wind. Give it up.
 
Boris Norris said:
Sorry comrade. This is been well hashed and no fraud was found. You're pissing against the wind. Give it up.
Click to expand...
No fraud was found by those who did not want to find fraud. Even lefties admit the Venezuelan election was stolen by crooks using Smartmatic machines connected to Dominion and to George Soros.



Smartmatic - Wikipedia

Controversy[edit]
Venezuela[edit]

2004 elections[edit]

After the presidential recall referendum of 2004 in Venezuela, some controversy was raised about the use of electronic voting (SAES voting machines) in that country. Studies following the 2004 Venezuela recall elections found that Smartmatic's network was "bi-directional" with data being able to be transferred both ways between Smartmatic devices and the telecommunications company CANTV, with alleged irregularities found between the Smartmatic and Venezuela's National Electoral Council election results.[10][111] Other independent election monitors claimed fraud and submitted appeals, and statistical evaluations including a peer-reviewed article in 2006[112] and a special section of 6-peer-reviewed article in 2011[113] concluded that it was likely that electronic election fraud had been committed. The analysis of communication patterns allowed for the hypothesis that the data in the machines could have been changed remotely, while another of the articles suggested that the outcome could have been altered from about 60% against the sitting president, to 58% for the sitting president. None of such hypotheses was ever confirmed by facts.

Representatives from international election observation agencies attested that the election conducted using SAES was at that time fair, accurate and compliant with the accepted timing and reliability criteria. These agencies included the Carter Center,[114] the Organization of American States (OAS),[115] and the European Union (EU).[116][114][115][117][118] Jennifer McCoy, Carter Center Director for the Americas, stated that several audits validated the accuracy of the machines. “We found a variation of only 0.1% between the paper receipts and the electronic results. This could be explained by voters putting the slips in the wrong ballot box”.[119][120]

Dr. Tulio Alvarez, who had performed an independent observation of the election which detailed the networks between CNE and Smartmatic, described the Carter Center's findings as "insufficient, superficial and irresponsible".[121]

2005 elections[edit]

Prior to the 2005 Venezuela parliamentary election, one technician could work around "the machine's allegedly random storage protocols" and remove voting secrecy. Since the voting systems were Windows-based and only randomized data, the technician was able to download a simple software that could place Windows files in order.[vague] Following this revelation, voter turnout dropped substantially with only 25% of registered Venezuelans voting and opposition parties withdrawing from the election. This resulted in Hugo Chávez's party, as well as his allied parties, to control 100% of Venezuela's National Assembly.[10]
 
mark francis said:
No fraud was found by those who did not want to find fraud. Even lefties admit the Venezuelan election was stolen by crooks using Smartmatic machines connected to Dominion and to George Soros.



Smartmatic - Wikipedia

Controversy[edit]
Venezuela[edit]

2004 elections[edit]

After the presidential recall referendum of 2004 in Venezuela, some controversy was raised about the use of electronic voting (SAES voting machines) in that country. Studies following the 2004 Venezuela recall elections found that Smartmatic's network was "bi-directional" with data being able to be transferred both ways between Smartmatic devices and the telecommunications company CANTV, with alleged irregularities found between the Smartmatic and Venezuela's National Electoral Council election results.[10][111] Other independent election monitors claimed fraud and submitted appeals, and statistical evaluations including a peer-reviewed article in 2006[112] and a special section of 6-peer-reviewed article in 2011[113] concluded that it was likely that electronic election fraud had been committed. The analysis of communication patterns allowed for the hypothesis that the data in the machines could have been changed remotely, while another of the articles suggested that the outcome could have been altered from about 60% against the sitting president, to 58% for the sitting president. None of such hypotheses was ever confirmed by facts.

Representatives from international election observation agencies attested that the election conducted using SAES was at that time fair, accurate and compliant with the accepted timing and reliability criteria. These agencies included the Carter Center,[114] the Organization of American States (OAS),[115] and the European Union (EU).[116][114][115][117][118] Jennifer McCoy, Carter Center Director for the Americas, stated that several audits validated the accuracy of the machines. “We found a variation of only 0.1% between the paper receipts and the electronic results. This could be explained by voters putting the slips in the wrong ballot box”.[119][120]

Dr. Tulio Alvarez, who had performed an independent observation of the election which detailed the networks between CNE and Smartmatic, described the Carter Center's findings as "insufficient, superficial and irresponsible".[121]

2005 elections[edit]

Prior to the 2005 Venezuela parliamentary election, one technician could work around "the machine's allegedly random storage protocols" and remove voting secrecy. Since the voting systems were Windows-based and only randomized data, the technician was able to download a simple software that could place Windows files in order.[vague] Following this revelation, voter turnout dropped substantially with only 25% of registered Venezuelans voting and opposition parties withdrawing from the election. This resulted in Hugo Chávez's party, as well as his allied parties, to control 100% of Venezuela's National Assembly.[10]
Click to expand...
Who gives a shit about Venezuela?
 
Werbung:

Similar threads

P
convictions for seditious conspiracy
Replies
3
Views
319
Boris Norris
B
B
J6
Replies
0
Views
228
Boris Norris
B
Real News Links
Proud Boys Protect Children
Replies
4
Views
483
pjmret
P
bradlux
Inspiration but no clear co-ordination between Trump and Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, Jan. 6 hearing suggests
Replies
12
Views
772
Boris Norris
B
M
    • Like
Democrat judge rules enhanced Democrat charges for alleged Jan 6 offences are unjust
2
Replies
25
Views
462
mark francis
M
Back
Top