News for Libs

Gipper

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
6,106
Location
Somewhere Nice
Out of the kindness of my cold heart I have agreed to post articles in this thread my lib friends will never see. This is a free service.

Now I recognize this thread will be difficult for libs to read. Because the posts here will conflict with their kooky ideology and the distortions the left media presents daily.

And now for the first post...News of Liberals. What libs will never see reported by their news sources.

Enjoy!

Left-Wing Terrorism Surges In Europe, As Governments Dismantle Social Safety Net
Joe Weisenthal | Sep. 12, 2010, 9:37 AM | 8,387 | comment 74

With European governments paring back the social safety net, and businesses blamed for creating a crisis, left-wing terrorism in Europe is on the march, according to a new report from EuroPol (the European Police Office).

Spain, Greece and Italy reported a total of 40 attacks by left-wing and anarchist groups for 2009.
This constitutes an increase of 43 % compared to 2008; the number of attacks more than doubled
since 2007.

As in previous years, most attacks were carried out successfully and mainly targeted government and
business interests.The majority of these attacks were arsons, reported by Spain, and caused only property damage.

The percentage of IED attacks decreased from 43 % in 2008 to 20 % in 2009; the majority of these bomb-ings occurred in Greece. In Greece, six left-wing terrorist organisations car-
ried out a total of 15 attacks in 2009.

As this chart shows, left-wing terrorism dwarfs right-wing terrorism in Europe -- perhaps surprising given the attention paid to Europe's far right. Islamist and Separatist terrorism, however, remain the largest categories.

terrorism.png


http://www.businessinsider.com/left-wing-terrorism-surges-in-europe-2010-9
 
Werbung:
Sarah Shourd is a commie lib. Did you libs know this? Of course not. But, leave it to me to keep you informed because your hard left news outlets won't.

She is an anti-Semite, anti-American and pro-Muslim. :eek:

How ironic that she gets thrown in prison by her beloved Iran. Libs really do kooky things don't they? Hahahahahahahahah

Now that she is a celebrity she will start spouting her leftist views. And, stupid lefties will give her lots of money.

American+Hikers_Iran_480x300_AP-1.jpg


* Sarah Shourd is an anti-Israel “journalist” who lives in the Middle East (probably in Damascus, Syria, from which she’s written some of her articles), writes sympathetic pieces about terrorist-host state Syria, attacking Israel, and taking her Syrian patrons’ false point of view that Israel’s Golan Heights is “occupied territory.” She also writes about how Israel oppresses the Syrians. Hilarious. I mean, no biggie that Bashir Al-Assad cuts his people apart limb by limb, like his father did to journalist Salim Al-Lawzi, that Syria has an atrocious human rights record and tortures dissidents, let’s concentrate on blaming the Jews. That’s her strategy.

Here’s a tip for Ms. Shourd: Israel annexed the Golan Heights years ago–you know, when Syria attacked Israel, went to war, and lost. Shourd lies and claims that Israel forced Syrian inhabitants of the Golan Heights to become Israeli citizens. Nauseatingly false. I have many Druze friends with family there. The Druze Arab inhabitants love the freedom they have as Israelis–of not having to worry if a conversation they have on the street will result in their limbs being amputated without anasthesia. The formely Syrian Druze of the Golan Heights rue the day when Syria gets it back (as Obama–and before him, Bush–have been pushing).

Shourd describes herself as a “ teacher-activist-writer from California currently based in the Middle East.” Well, we know for whom she’s an activist and writer–the Iranians-sponsored Syrians and other Islamic terrorists. I’m just worried about whom she is teaching.
http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=e276b8706a88aca9e3a98dbbd5526d1d
http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...Shourd/+sarah+shourd&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/5868...n-anti-israel-left-wing-journalist-activists/
http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2010/05/25/american-hiker-sarah-shourd-held-in-iran-ashamed-of-america/
 
John Boehner: the second of 12 kids from Ohio who is Barack Obama's elitist target
The White House is attempting to cling on to Democratic control of Washington by portraying an Ohio congressman who grew up in near poverty
as an elitist country club Republican controlled by wealthy lobbyists.

The family house on Hill Street initially had two bedrooms with Mr Boehner and three brothers sleeping in one, their sister in another and their parents on a pull-out bed in the living room. Their father Earl later built a three-bedroom extension.

Mrs Meineke, whose husband is an unemployed builder, still lives in the modest house. She remembers her father rising at dawn to go off to the café, which he ran with his twin brother and was a favourite with truck drivers.

"Then my mother would get up before all of us, and drink coffee and listen to the radio, packing our lunches and writing our names on all the brown bags.

"Then she'd start waking us up. You knew that if you didn't get up you'd be cutting your time in the bathroom in half. Sometimes, the boys had to go outside and pee by the tree."

Mr Boehner's deep tan is often mocked by Democrats. At a dinner last year, Mr Obama said: "He is a person of colour, although not a colour that appears in the natural world."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...Ohio-who-is-Barack-Obamas-elitist-target.html

The real John Boehner. How about that?

And now if the Rs take control of the House the lib media and the Dems will demonize a good man because he is an R.

They are shameless.
 
How about this??? Mexico intends to build a wall on their southern border, but we have no right to do the same. What hypocrites....just like many American liberals.

Mexican Government Proves to be Supreme Hypocrite
Written by Raven Clabough
Wednesday, 22 September 2010 15:00

Raul Diaz of the Mexican Superintendence of Tax Administration confirmed this week that the Mexican government intends to build a wall along the Mexican/Guatemalan border. Diaz claims that the official purpose of the wall is to prevent the passage of contraband, but has also admitted “It could also prevent the free passage of illegal immigrants.”

Defending the decision to construct the wall, Mexico’s National Commission on Human Rights states that 500,000 people from Central America cross into Mexico illegally every year.

The proposal to construct the wall appears to go against the principles held by Mexican President Felipe Calderon, who, when speaking out against the state of Arizona for its tough immigration measure, remarked, “Criminalizing immigration, which is a social economic phenomena, this way opens the door to intolerance, hate, and discrimination. My government cannot and will not remain indifferent when these kinds of policies go against human rights.”

http://www.thenewamerican.com/index...can-government-proves-to-be-supreme-hypocrite
 
Obama Stimulus Made Economic Crisis Worse, `Black Swan' Author Taleb Says
By Frederic Tomesco - Sep 25, 2010 10:36 AM ET


U.S. President Barack Obama and his administration weakened the country’s economy by seeking to foster growth instead of paying down the federal debt, said Nassim Nicholas Taleb, author of “The Black Swan.”

“Obama did exactly the opposite of what should have been done,” Taleb said yesterday in Montreal in a speech as part of Canada’s Salon Speakers series. “He surrounded himself with people who exacerbated the problem. You have a person who has cancer and instead of removing the cancer, you give him tranquilizers. When you give tranquilizers to a cancer patient, they feel better but the cancer gets worse.”

Today, Taleb said, “total debt is higher than it was in 2008 and unemployment is worse.”

Obama this month proposed a package of $180 billion in business tax breaks and infrastructure outlays to boost spending and job growth. That would come on top of the $814 billion stimulus measure enacted last year. The U.S. government’s total outstanding debt is about $13.5 trillion, according to U.S. Treasury Department figures.

Obama, 49, inherited what the National Bureau of Economic Research said this week was the deepest U.S. recession since the Great Depression. Even after the stimulus measure and other government actions, the U.S. unemployment rate is 9.6 percent.

Governments globally need to cut debt and avoid bailing out struggling companies because that’s the only way they can shield their economies from the negative consequences of erroneous budget forecasts, Taleb said.

Errant Forecasts

“Today there is a dependency on people who have never been able to forecast anything,” Taleb said. “What kind of system is insulated from forecasting errors? A system where debts are low and companies are allowed to die young when they are fragile. Companies always end up dying one day anyway.”

Taleb, a native of Lebanon who gave his speech in French to an audience of Quebec business people, said Canada’s fiscal situation makes the country a safer investment than its southern neighbor.

Canada has the lowest ratio of net debt to gross domestic product among the Group of Seven industrialized countries and will keep that distinction until at least 2014, the country’s finance department said in March. Canada’s ratio, 24 percent in 2007, will rise to about 30 percent by 2014. The U.S. ratio, now above 40 percent, will top 80 percent in four years, the department said, citing IMF data.

“I am bullish on Canada,” he told the audience. “I prefer Canada to the U.S. or even Europe.”

Mortgage Interest

Canada’s economy also benefits from the fact that homeowners, unlike their U.S. neighbors, can’t take mortgage interest as a tax deduction, Taleb said. That removes the incentive to take on too much debt, he said.

“The first thing to do if you want to solve the mortgage problem in the U.S. is to stop making these interest payments deductible,” he said. “Has someone dared to talk about this in Washington? No, because the U.S. homebuilders’ lobby is hyperactive and doesn’t want people to talk about this.”

Taleb also criticized banks and securities firms, saying they don’t adequately warn clients of the risks they run when they invest their retirement savings in the stock market.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-...ma-s-stimulus-made-economic-crisis-worse.html

How about that? A big time author and financier now says BO's Viagra plan only made things worse. Well I'm no author or financier, but I knew the results would be what they are from the get go.

Its easy. Just know history.
 
So you are posting articles here that your "lib friends will never see"? I bet if you didn't post anything at all, you'd get the same result and save yourself a lot of wasted time, huh?
 
So you are posting articles here that your "lib friends will never see"? I bet if you didn't post anything at all, you'd get the same result and save yourself a lot of wasted time, huh?

I am just trying to do my part to save you and your kind from your hellish existence.

Its the least I could do as a good Christian.
 
Happy Friday all... This from my Friday Follies file...of course every day is folly for libs...

I am willing to bet all my well earned credibility here at the HOP by asserting that libs are not aware of BO's ridiculous government spending. And, I am certain conservatives know exactly what he is doing.

So, in my most generous and considerate manner, I work 24/7 to keep libs informed...remember...everything you know is wrong.

Please libs read this and should you be incapable of comprehending it, just ask me for an explanation. And should you comprehend this FACTUAL report, is this a problem?

Obama Added More to National Debt in First 19 Months Than All Presidents from Washington Through Reagan Combined, Says Gov’t Data
In the first 19 months of the Obama administration, the federal debt held by the public increased by $2.5260 trillion, which is more than the cumulative total of the national debt held by the public that was amassed by all U.S. presidents from George Washington through Ronald Reagan.

Wednesday, September 08, 2010
By Terence P. Jeffrey

(CNSNews.com) - In the first 19 months of the Obama administration, the federal debt held by the public increased by $2.5260 trillion, which is more than the cumulative total of the national debt held by the public that was amassed by all U.S. presidents from George Washington through Ronald Reagan.
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/72404
 
I am just trying to do my part to save you and your kind from your hellish existence.

Its the least I could do as a good Christian.

Oh yeah, you are such a good Christian to save me from your loving God's "hell'. Talk about oxymorons!
 
Oh yeah, you are such a good Christian to save me from your loving God's "hell'. Talk about oxymorons!

I can't save you from Hell. Only you can do that. Don't believe what BO says about collective salvation. We can't collectively save each other. It is very much an individual thing...sorry.

But, I can save you from liberalism. The first step in your rehabilitation is to flip 180 degrees everything you think and you will be much closer to reality. And a lot happier too.
 
Gipper..I hope this fits..Obama welcomes new religious war... presumably to go along with the race war he continues to fuel with race card fire logs. Also his class warfare against the rich are now hammering away at the poor.

So you libs wanted change you got... all of the petty demagoguery that composes the liberal mind you got. And what is the result... more racism, more religious anger, more polarization. And now you have a lib controlled congress that is skidding out of control.

With the punish the rich scheme, actually the punish the moderately successful, obama has essentially shut down charities across the country because in addition to being the biggest taxpayers, the successful are the biggest givers of charitable donations. Go see how much the lower 85% of taxpayers give... it is basically zilch. Most of them, the lower 55% is on the take receiving earned income tax credit welfare. The whole system is contingent on the most successful paying 86% of all IRS tax collected [their fair share as the clinton's and obama have repeated in chorus] and now it is drying up.

The wealthy are expatriating as fast as the illegals can cross the reo Grande. So as you get rid of the productive, you get more seeing welfare and handouts! Beautiful. And tax collections have tanked.

Forget what obama political policies have done to the economy. Here we have more borrowing and spending and more deficits than any historical white house occupants and it is not a world war. Well not yet but if you burn enough US flags, Bibles and korans then maybe we will get there.

It is not the big things in life that make people mad. It is insulting their common sense. Whether you believe that a mosque is merely a symbol of the Muslim religion and not the world trade terrorists, you have to ask yourself if the placement on the mosque literally on the campus of the world trade center memorial is a matter of religious freedom or insulting politically.

All of the 9/11 terrorist professed that they were doing this for Islam. So apparently their belief system led them to the conclusion that killing US citizens was a good idea. So you say... but they were just radical extremists. Just like the guys that were doing video beheaings. The beef it seems to me is between the peaceful Muslims and the killers of innocent people but until they figure that out, putting a mosque up on 9/11 sends a wrong message. Because which one of the two polarities are to be believed?

Over 3000 people lost their lives. This is a grave. They never found all the bodies.

They say it is a private property issue. Yet for public sentiment strip joints can't be built on any block. Certain types of buildings can't be built within a certain number of feet from schools.

Why would any group want to build a mosque right near the worst terrorist attack in US history? It is hardly a sign of healing and that is why the public is upset. They don't want the strip club in their neighborhood.

To complicate matters or to resolve them, Trump offered a 25% profit to the owners of the property. And now the owners are holding out. They know the whole thing is infuriating the public. What would make someone behave like that? That is unreasonable. It is like the guy with the porn shop intentionally trying to press his will against the neighborhood standards.

So how much will Soho hold out for? Who knows but at some point that too becomes blackmail.

And here you have Obama siding with the muslims just feeding the fire with more fire logs. Then you have RINO now independent bloomberg claiming that this is not about terrorists it is about Muslim religion which is a matter of religious freedom. So here we see liberals adhering to the First Amendment which they never do if it involves any symbol of Christianity, not a manger or Christmas scene. But they say this is private property. Again I repeat private property rights are not unlimited and must answer to local pubic standards.

But the democrats have been doing this all year to the public. They ignored the public's outrage over obmacare, cap and trade, the bailouts etc. But they did what they wanted with the assumption that pelosi and reid knew better than the people what they wanted.

But now this gets personal but dems don't care. For them the world is one great big abortion clinic where every American has to subject themselves to insult in the name of privacy, or religious freedom etc. Yet let's remember it is the libs that want the censorship of media by the fairness doctrine. They want to shut down opposing voices. Just like that moron out here that plays the dumb country boy shtick. He has an agenda.

So I applaud Trump for trying to do something he thought best for the people of NYC while the libs and bloomberg push their will against the people. And this company Soho? Where do they get there money? I bet if you look close it comes indirectly from bin laden. This is the way radial muslims operate. they play games. Remember Saddam and his signs "Baby Milk Factory" and inside was a weapons arsenal.

So I say the whole outrage speaks for itself. The people by a large majority are opposed to this mosque near this burial site. If you want to blindly say it is a property issue then just consider this a porn shop because local sentiment does matter. Nobody is blocking this mosque over matters of property or religious freedom. They are blocking it because it is too close to a grave site which some fundamentalist Muslims caused. It is not necessary for the American public to decided which faction of the Muslim religion caused this; plenty of Muslims across the US were happy to see the towers go down. Don't lull yourself into believing that one group of Muslims is good an another bad. It is always a mixed bag.

But one thing people don't need is politicians spinning arguments to find an excuse and a way out. It is not the Citizens that have anything to prove, it is the Muslims that have a long long way to go to prove their religion preaches decency and tolerance to others. The Koran preaches no such message. So I am not going to invent an excuse and cloak it in a property issue. This is not about private property rights. It is about a distasteful and provocative conduct of a group of muslims that insist on adding insult to irritation and have ignited a firestorm and are now holding the nation hostage.

Just as the decent folks on those doomed aircraft were held hostage to the will of their lying captures. Remember they told the passengers no harm would come to them though they planned to murder them all. They said their muslim prayers into the black boxes knowing full well they were murdering. Yet there is not one commandment in the Muslim Koran that says "thou shalt not kill" in fact it is quite the opposite, the Koran allows killing for the advancement of the nation of Islam and condones its. The Koran is not about tolerance it is about utter intolerance for any religion but theirs.

And don't look at obama as a Christian as he claims. He is a Rev Wright strain remember the sermon.... "GD American?" Obama and his baboon sat through 14 years of that message and still were unable to form an opinion about it's validity. But Obama sure knows how to pray to Allah. He knows all the prayers. So just pass me another one of them fire logs... says obama and enjoy some more religious and racial polarization in your face.


regards
doug
 
Gipper..I hope this fits..Obama welcomes new religious war... presumably to go along with the race war he continues to fuel with race card fire logs. Also his class warfare against the rich are now hammering away at the poor.

So you libs wanted change you got... all of the petty demagoguery that composes the liberal mind you got. And what is the result... more racism, more religious anger, more polarization. And now you have a lib controlled congress that is skidding out of control.

With the punish the rich scheme, actually the punish the moderately successful, obama has essentially shut down charities across the country because in addition to being the biggest taxpayers, the successful are the biggest givers of charitable donations. Go see how much the lower 85% of taxpayers give... it is basically zilch. Most of them, the lower 55% is on the take receiving earned income tax credit welfare. The whole system is contingent on the most successful paying 86% of all IRS tax collected [their fair share as the clinton's and obama have repeated in chorus] and now it is drying up.

The wealthy are expatriating as fast as the illegals can cross the reo Grande. So as you get rid of the productive, you get more seeing welfare and handouts! Beautiful. And tax collections have tanked.

Forget what obama political policies have done to the economy. Here we have more borrowing and spending and more deficits than any historical white house occupants and it is not a world war. Well not yet but if you burn enough US flags, Bibles and korans then maybe we will get there.

It is not the big things in life that make people mad. It is insulting their common sense. Whether you believe that a mosque is merely a symbol of the Muslim religion and not the world trade terrorists, you have to ask yourself if the placement on the mosque literally on the campus of the world trade center memorial is a matter of religious freedom or insulting politically.

All of the 9/11 terrorist professed that they were doing this for Islam. So apparently their belief system led them to the conclusion that killing US citizens was a good idea. So you say... but they were just radical extremists. Just like the guys that were doing video beheaings. The beef it seems to me is between the peaceful Muslims and the killers of innocent people but until they figure that out, putting a mosque up on 9/11 sends a wrong message. Because which one of the two polarities are to be believed?

Over 3000 people lost their lives. This is a grave. They never found all the bodies.

They say it is a private property issue. Yet for public sentiment strip joints can't be built on any block. Certain types of buildings can't be built within a certain number of feet from schools.

Why would any group want to build a mosque right near the worst terrorist attack in US history? It is hardly a sign of healing and that is why the public is upset. They don't want the strip club in their neighborhood.

To complicate matters or to resolve them, Trump offered a 25% profit to the owners of the property. And now the owners are holding out. They know the whole thing is infuriating the public. What would make someone behave like that? That is unreasonable. It is like the guy with the porn shop intentionally trying to press his will against the neighborhood standards.

So how much will Soho hold out for? Who knows but at some point that too becomes blackmail.

And here you have Obama siding with the muslims just feeding the fire with more fire logs. Then you have RINO now independent bloomberg claiming that this is not about terrorists it is about Muslim religion which is a matter of religious freedom. So here we see liberals adhering to the First Amendment which they never do if it involves any symbol of Christianity, not a manger or Christmas scene. But they say this is private property. Again I repeat private property rights are not unlimited and must answer to local pubic standards.

But the democrats have been doing this all year to the public. They ignored the public's outrage over obmacare, cap and trade, the bailouts etc. But they did what they wanted with the assumption that pelosi and reid knew better than the people what they wanted.

But now this gets personal but dems don't care. For them the world is one great big abortion clinic where every American has to subject themselves to insult in the name of privacy, or religious freedom etc. Yet let's remember it is the libs that want the censorship of media by the fairness doctrine. They want to shut down opposing voices. Just like that moron out here that plays the dumb country boy shtick. He has an agenda.

So I applaud Trump for trying to do something he thought best for the people of NYC while the libs and bloomberg push their will against the people. And this company Soho? Where do they get there money? I bet if you look close it comes indirectly from bin laden. This is the way radial muslims operate. they play games. Remember Saddam and his signs "Baby Milk Factory" and inside was a weapons arsenal.

So I say the whole outrage speaks for itself. The people by a large majority are opposed to this mosque near this burial site. If you want to blindly say it is a property issue then just consider this a porn shop because local sentiment does matter. Nobody is blocking this mosque over matters of property or religious freedom. They are blocking it because it is too close to a grave site which some fundamentalist Muslims caused. It is not necessary for the American public to decided which faction of the Muslim religion caused this; plenty of Muslims across the US were happy to see the towers go down. Don't lull yourself into believing that one group of Muslims is good an another bad. It is always a mixed bag.

But one thing people don't need is politicians spinning arguments to find an excuse and a way out. It is not the Citizens that have anything to prove, it is the Muslims that have a long long way to go to prove their religion preaches decency and tolerance to others. The Koran preaches no such message. So I am not going to invent an excuse and cloak it in a property issue. This is not about private property rights. It is about a distasteful and provocative conduct of a group of muslims that insist on adding insult to irritation and have ignited a firestorm and are now holding the nation hostage.

Just as the decent folks on those doomed aircraft were held hostage to the will of their lying captures. Remember they told the passengers no harm would come to them though they planned to murder them all. They said their muslim prayers into the black boxes knowing full well they were murdering. Yet there is not one commandment in the Muslim Koran that says "thou shalt not kill" in fact it is quite the opposite, the Koran allows killing for the advancement of the nation of Islam and condones its. The Koran is not about tolerance it is about utter intolerance for any religion but theirs.

And don't look at obama as a Christian as he claims. He is a Rev Wright strain remember the sermon.... "GD American?" Obama and his baboon sat through 14 years of that message and still were unable to form an opinion about it's validity. But Obama sure knows how to pray to Allah. He knows all the prayers. So just pass me another one of them fire logs... says obama and enjoy some more religious and racial polarization in your face.


regards
doug

man I almost wasted my time to read that...but lucky you went loco very fast so I did not have to bother reading...
 
pocket..It's all facts my friend..with a ferw liberties taken..LOL..to few to mention..

regards
doug
 
Werbung:
I can't save you from Hell. Only you can do that. Don't believe what BO says about collective salvation. We can't collectively save each other. It is very much an individual thing...sorry.

But, I can save you from liberalism. The first step in your rehabilitation is to flip 180 degrees everything you think and you will be much closer to reality. And a lot happier too.

Every man for himself, eh? How Darwinian of you. :)
 
Back
Top