A fake missile launching (4/23/2012) (716.) It might be a hoax that N. Korea launched a missile. US had just had an agreement with N. Korea on February 29 to exchange the food aid with a promise of no nuclear test and missile test. Why did the N. Korea break up the promise within a month? It doesn't make sense. My interpretation is that the Feds had planned a drug case on April 14. My wife was arranged for a trip to China. The leaving date was April 14. The announced rocket launch date was between 4/12 - 4/16. To distract public attention from an area news, the Feds used to prepare big events. In this case it was Iran war. The missile launch of North Korea was used to create a war atmosphere. They also prepared big natural disaster. I think the plan of the Feds went soured after my revelation. Two articles were written on 4/1 and 4/9 to predict there would have been a framed case on 4/14 which would accompanied with big distract events. See "713. 4/14 plot and N.Korea's missile launch (4/1/2012)" and "714. Planting to frame a case on 4/14 (4/9/2012)". If the plot went soured, it was unnecessary to launch the missile. The media said that the cost to launch that missile was about 850 million. The order was from the Feds, it pays the cost. Although Pentagon has a fat budget - that almost equals to the total military expense of the rest world, it still saves a lot of money when the order was cancelled. US has deficit problem now. I don't think North Korea has launched that missile on 4/12 as they announced. It was a hoax. Reason: (1) North Korea made it a serious business at first. They invited international press to report the Launching, that was rare. All journalists expected they would see it in live. Instead of, they were told of the news which they should have reported. It became a joke. Apparantly it was not the original motivation to invite an international press delegate. North Korea had set up a screen show for them. Something unusual happened on 4/12. I think the secret deal was changed at that time. There was no missile launch could be shown to the press. (2) A "launch" by stealth". Because the press was invited to watch the launch, it was an open operation. The possible launh date would be 4/14 as N. Korean government pre-announced it was from 4/12 - 4/16. why made it a stealth? My interpretation is: the Feds cancelled the order and replaced it by a fake "launch". To prevent curious watch eyes from outsiders, they made a stealth launch. Nobody could prove there was such a "launch". (3) It was rare that Norht Korea quickly admitted the failure of this operation. They said it might be a style change of the new leader. I thought the new leader had no such a psychological burden because there was no such a "failure" at all. He just admitted "failure" to the deal. It's only a lip service. (4) This third time missile launch was much worse than the privious two. It flied a short distance (one hundred miles) in a minute then fell into Yellow Sea. A technique retrogress? Or rather, a make up to justify a lie that no one could eye witness it. Earthquake and tornado (4/28/2012) (717) In this April 14 plot, you also saw the Feds distract the framed case with natural disaster: (watch the timing) 1. Earthquake in Mexico and Indonesia. 2. Tornado in US. The main earthquake happened on April 11, both in Indonesia and Mexico. I think it was used to justify a planned earthquake in US. If the framed drug case had gone through successfully, there would have been a very big earthquake in US. The media would say there was an earthquake cycle. I think HAARP was used to create the earthquake. It may take hours or a day to see the effect after the HAARP being activated. It may take longer time to create tornado. A tornado needs warm and humid air mass. To create such a weather condition it may take a few days or longer. We often saw the chem trail in sky, that's a way the Feds used to alter the weather - to change the air pressure of the area to form an air passage so the needed air mass could move through. Though April 14 plot was cancelled on April 12, the climate situation had been created to a tornado one already. (see 4/13 news: "Atmospheric conditions will be similar to those that caused severe storms....") So we still saw the tornado in that week end.