1. Come and join our community by registering for free here and start discussing politics! HOP - the political discussion forum

Missile Launch off California - Pentagon has "no clue" who launched it

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Debates' started by BigRob, Nov 9, 2010.

  1. BigRob Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Message Count:
    6,913
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    USA
    This just makes you feel good.

    Given that the military apparently has no idea who fired this missile, it cannot rule out that it was fired by someone other than the United States, which would be a major problem if other nations were able to come right up near shore, fire a missile, and we would have "no clue."
  2. Little-Acorn Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Message Count:
    2,425
    Likes Received:
    146
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Oh, so when military spokesholes say they don't know, that means no one in the military knows?

    And there's no chance that they decided to keep the information secret for various reasons, and so told their spokesholes nothing?

    Is this the "new intelligence" now? :rolleyes:
  3. BigRob Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Message Count:
    6,913
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    USA
    What scenario exactly are you imagining in which this launch is some state secret?

    There is nothing about this scenario that indicates it is anything of the sort.
  4. Little-Acorn Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Message Count:
    2,425
    Likes Received:
    146
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Other than what I just pointed out, of course. :rolleyes:
  5. BigRob Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Message Count:
    6,913
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    USA
    You didn't point out anything....saying a spokesperson was not told is not pointing out an actual scenario which would make a missile test here some state secret...

    I also have to say, for someone who rails against government regularly on this board, you seem to have a large amount of blind faith in the government here.
  6. steveox Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 13, 2007
    Message Count:
    5,883
    Likes Received:
    133
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Way Down South
    Dam!!!! I thought North Korea took care of California today.. Shuckers!!!:mad:
  7. Gipper Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Message Count:
    5,758
    Likes Received:
    316
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Winter Wonderland
    I think you misunderstand. LA is not going on blind faith here. He is just pointing out that the military could be withholding details for various reasons. Tell me if I am wrong LA.

    One of the reasons could be someone screwed up.
  8. Rick New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Message Count:
    1,843
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Polar orbit intelligence satellites are launched from california. They don't advertise anything about them.
  9. orogenicman New Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    734
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The missile was launched from 30 miles out in the Pacific. Since there are no permanent lauch facilities out there, it had to have been a submarine launch. And if so, and it wasn't ours, then who the hell launched it? The Pentagon's explanation doesn't add up. They don't know who launched it but it doesn't pose a threat? If they don't know who launched it, then how do they know such an action doesn't pose a threat? IMO, if they know it doesn't pose a threat, then they know who launched it and aren't saying. Otherwise, they just look completely incompetent, which, post 9/11, would not be a surprise to me.
  10. BigRob Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Message Count:
    6,913
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    USA
    The launch came from offshore apparently. I could be wrong, but I am pretty sure polar orbit satellites are not launched from offshore.
  11. BigRob Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Message Count:
    6,913
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    USA
    I somewhat gathered that from his response, which is why I asked him to expound on those reasons... and he has not as of yet.

    If one of those reasons is that someone "screwed up", then it begs the question how (what appears to be an ICBM from a former DOD official) was launched "on accident."
  12. orogenicman New Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    734
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  13. gazanita New Member

    Member Since:
    May 28, 2008
    Message Count:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    do we all feel safer in our beds now?
  14. kathaksung New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Message Count:
    160
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So far there is no "other nations" that is strong enough to challenge the only super power of the world. It doesn't make sense. The fact is: there is a rocket launching. Pentagon denied it. My two cents here:

    Feds planed a nuclear attack in later October. They stole a rocket. When plan went soured, they shoot it to eliminate the evidence.

    Here is my explanation for that false flag plot. Extracted from my blog:

  15. GenSeneca Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Message Count:
    6,068
    Likes Received:
    443
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    ={CaLiCo}= HQ
    The "feds" couldn't frame Kathaksung for a drug case so they decided to abort their "black flag" mission to nuke the US and became so enraged that they now threaten to kill and eat him...

    This guy is pure gold! :D
  16. BigRob Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Message Count:
    6,913
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    USA
    Classic. :)
  17. kathaksung New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Message Count:
    160
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The nuclear attack targeted at AE911 TRUTH. Re:

  18. katsung47 Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Message Count:
    302
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Christmas holiday plot (12/9/2010) (656)

    The next plot on me and my family likely will be in coming Christmas and New Year's day holiday season. They used to apply a search and arrest warrant on holiday because there is family re-union that day. This time the Feds arranged a 7 night Western Carib - holiday cruise (from 12/19 to 12/26) for my family. I refused the invitation because it is easy to frame a case or apply an incident on a trip. However, it will cut my connection to most of my relatives. Almost all of my relatives in San Francisco area joined that trip. Plus some relatives of my wife's. They were murder targets too. see: 223. FBI director said Hong Kong will be attacked (4/24/04) 242. Dr. Wang is a target (7/24)383. The cross murder deal (2/7/06), 392. 12/2 plot to murder Mr. Wang Yi Hong (3/15/06).

    This is the third long time trip for my wife this year which never has happened before. It may prove how intensify the persecution is going on.

    Last month (November) a cruise ship Carnival had a fire. It drifted on the sea for three days without power. "They can call it a nightmare. A cruise from hell." (AP) said.

    I think it was a psychological pre-planting prepared for a coming incident of Royal Caribean (a cruise arranged for my family) if a framed case would go through. After that there will be terror attacks, (nuclear attack) Korean crisis and Iran war.



    658. Korea crisis (2011/2/17)

    In #656. kathaksung said,

    “The next possible action on me and my family likely will be in coming Christmas and New Year's day holiday season. Feds used to apply a search and arrest warrant on holiday because there is family re-union that day. This time the Feds arranged a 7 night Western Carib - holiday cruise for my family, dated from Dec. 19 to Dec. 26.”

    If the case had gone through, there would be big event to distract public attention. They used to be natural disaster such like earthquake, pandemic…., or war in Korea, Iran…., or terror attack…. .

    The distraction for 2010 Christmas holiday plot was war in Korea and terror attack in Britain and US.

    N. Korea shot artillery in later November onto a S. Korea n island. It accused the planned U.S -S. Korean military drills were pushing the peninsula to the “brink of war”. S. Korea shelled back too on N. Korea.

    Then N. Korea threatened the South with an unspecified “catastrophe” if the y dare to carry out the military exercise with US army. The President of S. Korea declared that the reunification of Korea was drawing near. A real big war was coming.

    In fact, N. Korea has no ability to afford a war at this time. It has a food shortage. It even can not feed its own military. So that's just a soap opera. The handler is US. The action order used to be delivered through China. However, the game this time is too big. N. Korea was suspicious. To guarantee it was just another soap opera show, they want to hear the command from its master personally. Then you saw Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico had a trip to N. Korea.

    Bill Richardson is a representative of the Feds. He visited N. Korea between 12/16 and 12/20. He left N. Korea on 12/20. It was the starting time of the alleged arranged cruise trip - dated from Dec. 19 to Dec. 26. (see second paragraph of this article) If the Feds had succeeded to frame a drug case when the cruise trip started, then Richardson would give N. Korea the order “Go”. A big war would have started. But the set up failed, so Richardson’s trip became one that “break through the North isolation” and “yielded important progress”.

    N. Korea officials had an unusual soft tone at the night of 12/20.

    Quote, “North Korea withholds retaliation after drills

    By Sharon LaFraniere and Martin Fackler
    New York Times

    …..North’s official news agency issued a statement Monday night (12/20) saying that it was “not worth reacting” to the exercise. ….. “The world should properly know who is the true champion of peace and who is the real provocateur of a war.””

    You could feel the relaxation of N. Korea and thus to know how big the war could be if the 2010 Christmas plot would have gone through.
  19. steveox Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 13, 2007
    Message Count:
    5,883
    Likes Received:
    133
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Way Down South
    I Launched it from my puter. Im warning the Middle East settle down or they know whats comming next.
  20. TruthSeeker New Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Message Count:
    836
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Somebody please tell me that "Katsung" and "Kathaksung" are some sort of old-fashioned vaudeville-type show.

    OK, I'll settle for them being a couple of 12-year-olds who have been playing way too many "black ops" video games.

Share This Page