God:The Threshold of Ignorance
Despite all modern discoveries and scientific progress knowledge is still unable to provide answers to fundamental questions.Our Living Universe in its presence, form, structure, development and change, its constituent elements, its laws and control, its origin and finality remain totally enigmatic inaccessible to knowledge. Life, in its presence form, structure, development, change, origin and finality is still a total mysterious phenomenon.The role of man is limited to observation. He does not play any role in the presence, change and development of anything. He only observes and concludes, trying to unsolved the dilemma and at best makes use of what is.What is matter and what is time, remain unsolvable queries. The nature of an object remains mysterious. The universe and its billions f galaxies; life and its billions of manifestations are still des enigmas posing great difficulties for knowledge. The nature of things, its presence, its origins and its finalities are still puzzling questions. Our knowledge, at the present time, appertains to superficial observation of what is. The presence, origin and finality are still in the domain of the unknown. We are attaining a descriptive notion of the manifestations of the mysterious. The atom, basic element of matter, is still unknown in its nature, presence, origin and behaviour as well as its finality. How did the Universe come about and what forces control its form, structure and development, are still unexplored.What is life and where does it come from and why should there be life remain unsolvable questions.What force, whether an internal or an external finality, decide the presence, the nature, the origin and the form and structure as well as the finality of the universe and its constituent elements?
Science is still unable to answer these questions. What the scientist deals with is how an object is and can make use of it in one way. The scientist does not apply the why question in his work, although subject to this question in his personal outlook.Every individual asks himself these fundamental questions and awaiting science or philosophy to provide satisfactory answers he recoils about his own survival.Our purpose in this work is to try and establish this very question of why is knowledge of fundamental questions should be limited to the observational-utility dimension and not attain ultimate knowledge of things? In other words we attempt to examine the question of a possible presumption of a ‘threshold of ignorance' that is essentially steadfast.
Despite all modern discoveries and scientific progress knowledge is still unable to provide answers to fundamental questions.Our Living Universe in its presence, form, structure, development and change, its constituent elements, its laws and control, its origin and finality remain totally enigmatic inaccessible to knowledge. Life, in its presence form, structure, development, change, origin and finality is still a total mysterious phenomenon.The role of man is limited to observation. He does not play any role in the presence, change and development of anything. He only observes and concludes, trying to unsolved the dilemma and at best makes use of what is.What is matter and what is time, remain unsolvable queries. The nature of an object remains mysterious. The universe and its billions f galaxies; life and its billions of manifestations are still des enigmas posing great difficulties for knowledge. The nature of things, its presence, its origins and its finalities are still puzzling questions. Our knowledge, at the present time, appertains to superficial observation of what is. The presence, origin and finality are still in the domain of the unknown. We are attaining a descriptive notion of the manifestations of the mysterious. The atom, basic element of matter, is still unknown in its nature, presence, origin and behaviour as well as its finality. How did the Universe come about and what forces control its form, structure and development, are still unexplored.What is life and where does it come from and why should there be life remain unsolvable questions.What force, whether an internal or an external finality, decide the presence, the nature, the origin and the form and structure as well as the finality of the universe and its constituent elements?
Science is still unable to answer these questions. What the scientist deals with is how an object is and can make use of it in one way. The scientist does not apply the why question in his work, although subject to this question in his personal outlook.Every individual asks himself these fundamental questions and awaiting science or philosophy to provide satisfactory answers he recoils about his own survival.Our purpose in this work is to try and establish this very question of why is knowledge of fundamental questions should be limited to the observational-utility dimension and not attain ultimate knowledge of things? In other words we attempt to examine the question of a possible presumption of a ‘threshold of ignorance' that is essentially steadfast.