European retirement ages in the spotlight

dogtowner

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 24, 2009
Messages
17,849
Location
Wandering around
I can see why

too bad EU decided to avoid its unemployment issues in the way it did. kicking the can down the road only delays, never solves.


If Elisabet Wilhelmsson were Italian, statistics suggest she would be in her sixth year of retirement. Instead, the 64-year-old Swede teaches high-school history and religion in the southern town of Lund and has no plans to retire until past her 67th birthday.

“I may reduce my hours, or take a little pause. If I am healthy, I could always come back,” she says. The official retirement age of 65 seems to be of little importance to her.

Mrs Wilhelmsson is no exception in Sweden, where more than 70 per cent of people aged 55 to 64 still work. Further south, in France or Italy for example, the figure is under 40 per cent.

As the European Union tries to tackle its chronic public debt problems, the costs associated with ageing have come into focus. Rising life expectancy just as the baby-boomer generation approaches retirement means it is becoming harder to fund today’s system across most of the continent.

The European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, wants to use its new remit for policing national budgets to push governments to change tack on pensions. Reform was “urgently required in some countries as part of current actions to restore confidence in government finance”, it warned in a report published on Thursday.

László Andor, commissioner for social affairs, said Brussels would specifically target pensions in profligate states. “We need to achieve a better balance between time spent in employment and time spent in retirement,” he said.

Although retirement ages have been raised in many countries, the Commission is concerned that these do not necessarily correlate with the age at which workers retire.
 
Werbung:
The government is responsible to take care that a basic living standard is possible for all. Pensions are not a responsibility of a government, therefore state pensions can be abolished! Then there is no retirement age at all. All these debt loads caused by state pensions and future state pensions can be eliminated.
Instead: The state can pay a free basic income to all (not relevant of age) and a private pension system can be installed where people can choose to get a pension from the age of 50 (0 to 100% of proceeds). After 50 people can gradually work less hours and can slowly retire.
With a free basic income also the term unemployment can be terminated, all the money wasted for pushing people into jobs they don't want can be saved.

Ideology from www.euredo.org
 
And where is the money going to come from for these so called "free" basic incomes?
 
In Germany for example all these social programs - unemployment benefits, pensions, social welfare, costs of employment programs and so on
cost an enormous amount divided by number of residents more then 1000 Euros monthly per person (Calculation by Mr. finance minister Schäuble)!!!
The money is already there, it is just distributed wrong. A free basic income would cost less then all these social programs with its huge administration costs.
 
The retirement age in Australia has already resen to 67. Then we either get a state provided pension or live on Superannuation
 
Welcome to the HOP Euredo,

In Germany for example all these social programs - unemployment benefits, pensions, social welfare, costs of employment programs and so on
Such programs are facing austerity cuts because they force the government to spend more than it brings in, which creates deficits that are adding to Germany's current national debt of more than 83% of their GDP. Perpetually spending more than you can afford is unsustainable, as evidenced most recently in Greece.

cost an enormous amount divided by number of residents more then 1000 Euros monthly per person (Calculation by Mr. finance minister Schäuble)!!!
How much money per capita does the German government raise in revenue per month? If you actually look at the math, the pipe dream goes up in smoke.

The money is already there, it is just distributed wrong.
The money is not there. If the money were there, Germany would have no need to enact austerity measures, Germany would have no deficits, and Germany would have no national debt.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top