Energy Efficiency, I Guess --- Soylent Green, Anyone?

Werbung:
BCCatholicFirst2GrafsReOreFetalWaste042114.jpg
 
I just found out about the Oregon one today. I heard about the hospital in England last week. I live in Oregon, about 45 minutes from this plant. This really bothers me. Just using the power it takes being on the computer and watching the news, I dread turning on the oven to make dinner. I want no part of this. The world is so screwed up :(
 
If you think the babies or fetus were humans, they should be bury with respect. Catholic belief that life begins with conception
 
Does the burning of human tissue actually produce a net gain of energy? The OP sounds as if they're fueling the furnace with aborted fetuses.

along with other discarded human tissue, of course, but no one cares about that, do they?
 
PLC1 said:
Does the burning of human tissue actually produce a net gain of energy? The OP sounds as if they're fueling the furnace with aborted fetuses.

along with other discarded human tissue, of course, but no one cares about that, do they?
Click to expand...

Did anybody say they didn't care about that?
 
GBFan said:
Did anybody say they didn't care about that?
Click to expand...
It's pretty obvious that the OP wants us to believe that the power company is using aborted fetuses as fuel.

Medical waste, whether it is from abortions, amputations, removal of tumors, or whatever has to be burned in order to prevent the spread of diseases. that much should be obvious.

Human tissue from whatever source has way too much water in it to be used as fuel. That much should also be obvious.
 
PLC1 said:
It's pretty obvious that the OP wants us to believe that the power company is using aborted fetuses as fuel.

Medical waste, whether it is from abortions, amputations, removal of tumors, or whatever has to be burned in order to prevent the spread of diseases. that much should be obvious.

Human tissue from whatever source has way too much water in it to be used as fuel. That much should also be obvious.
Click to expand...

As the original poster, I offered you published information that, in fact, the power company is using aborted fetuses as fuel. I make no comment on the accuracy of it ... except to note that this has been reported by numerous news agencies and has been commented on by the administration in Oregon.

Further, you'll notice that the original post was a discussion about the practice in England, and the second in British Columbia. If it's impossible, it would seem it would be impossible in those places, too.

As for your comment about too much water to be used as fuel ... I don't think you've thought that through. Burning carbon-based materials in order to create energy conversion has only been going on for the past 3500 years or so (Hint: think about steam-driven electric generation).
 
GBFan said:
As the original poster, I offered you published information that, in fact, the power company is using aborted fetuses as fuel. I make no comment on the accuracy of it ... except to note that this has been reported by numerous news agencies and has been commented on by the administration in Oregon.

Further, you'll notice that the original post was a discussion about the practice in England, and the second in British Columbia. If it's impossible, it would seem it would be impossible in those places, too.

As for your comment about too much water to be used as fuel ... I don't think you've thought that through. Burning carbon-based materials in order to create energy conversion has only been going on for the past 3500 years or so (Hint: think about steam-driven electric generation).
Click to expand...

Human tissue and coal are two different things.
 
Sounds creepy but what would you prefer they do with it ? Not exactly buying that you can burn body parts without providing fuel. Cremation is
 
GBFan said:
So are apples and igneous rocks ... but it has nothing to do with this discussion.
Click to expand...
then neither does:

"Burning carbon-based materials in order to create energy conversion has only been going on for the past 3500 years or so (Hint: think about steam-driven electric generation)."
 
PLC1 said:
then neither does:

"Burning carbon-based materials in order to create energy conversion has only been going on for the past 3500 years or so (Hint: think about steam-driven electric generation)."
Click to expand...

Well, actually, it does ... but, apparently, the connection is too esoteric for you.
 
Werbung:

Similar threads

Devil505
President Obama's First Year Accomplishments
2 3
Replies
33
Views
2K
Phoenix68
Phoenix68
Back
Top