Barack Hussein Obama "Dreams from a Marxist"

The progressive movement of which Maddow is a big fan and probably so are you, is predicated on a big lie that printing money leads to prosperity, but it actually leads to societal deterioration.


Cheney said "deficits don't matter", and then helped to start two unpaid for wars. So, spending fiat currency is good if it is spent on wars, and the military, bad if it is spent on the people.

You show a complete lack of understanding of the founding of this country, and my position on everything, which I do not find surprising.
 
Werbung:
Cheney said "deficits don't matter", and then helped to start two unpaid for wars. So, spending fiat currency is good if it is spent on wars, and the military, bad if it is spent on the people.

You show a complete lack of understanding of the founding of this country, and my position on everything, which I do not find surprising.

You're just acting silly with the "founding of this country" comment.

Say whatever you wish, but your socialist idol Obama increased the national debt more than every previous president combined, and no amount of leftist spin is going to change that fact.

Now will you show a complete lack of understanding of a fact?
 
You're just acting silly with the "founding of this country" comment.

Say whatever you wish, but your socialist idol Obama increased the national debt more than every previous president combined, and no amount of leftist spin is going to change that fact.

Now will you show a complete lack of understanding of a fact?
It is the Congress, not the president, who spends the money. No amount of socialist spin will change that fact.
 
It is the Congress, not the president, who spends the money. No amount of socialist spin will change that fact.

Yea, yea, yea...liberal spin, because we all know that POTUS leads the country with spending ideas because of his veto power. Obama could have vetoed that massive spending, but he didn't because he approved of it. POTUS is ultimately responsible for the national debt, but you already knew that.
 
Yea, yea, yea...liberal spin, because we all know that POTUS leads the country with spending ideas because of his veto power. Obama could have vetoed that massive spending, but he didn't because he approved of it. POTUS is ultimately responsible for the national debt, but you already knew that.


POTUS is only "responsible" because the people have been taught to believe that by a Congress that relies on the peoples ignorance. You do understand that vetoes can be reversed, right?

BTW, just what parts of the budget do you think could have been stopped?
 
POTUS is only "responsible" because the people have been taught to believe that by a Congress that relies on the peoples ignorance. You do understand that vetoes can be reversed, right?

BTW, just what parts of the budget do you think could have been stopped?

How about crony capitalism spending for one. Billions spent on green energy projects that were doomed from the start to fail.

How about billions given to Islamist friends of your beloved president Obama.

The big thing, as you know, is entitlement spending and the waste, fraud, and abuse that goes on there...that Donald Trump will clean up which will save the US taxpayers so many billions of dollars.
 
How about crony capitalism spending for one. Billions spent on green energy projects that were doomed from the start to fail.

They were not doomed to fail. That they were mismanaged is a usual reality regardless of who is in office. One could say the same about the invasion of Iraq/Afghanistan. As to cronyism, your boy Trump is already practicing in in his appointments to the cabinet, and his attempt to have the British select his choice for the Ambassador to America.

How about billions given to Islamist friends of your beloved president Obama.

And Bush did the same to even a greater degree.

The big thing, as you know, is entitlement spending and the waste, fraud, and abuse that goes on there...that Donald Trump will clean up which will save the US taxpayers so many billions of dollars.

Trump won't touch it just as no one else has. Back in the 90's Gingrich with his "Contract with America" said they would do the same thing as well as secure the border, fix the healthcare system, etc. Nothing was done in the 20 years since, and Trump will do nothing now. Trump won the Repugnant nod without having to release his tax records, his medical records (what he did release was a fraud), without having to bring his businesses back to the US ( and ignorant fools bought that garbage made in China by the tons), without having to prove anything, or even produce his "secret" plans for the budget, ISIS, etc.

Get out your crying towel idiot. You are in for a rough ride. Unfortunately, because of your stupidity so are the rest of us.
 
They were not doomed to fail. That they were mismanaged is a usual reality regardless of who is in office. One could say the same about the invasion of Iraq/Afghanistan. As to cronyism, your boy Trump is already practicing in in his appointments to the cabinet, and his attempt to have the British select his choice for the Ambassador to America.



And Bush did the same to even a greater degree.



Trump won't touch it just as no one else has. Back in the 90's Gingrich with his "Contract with America" said they would do the same thing as well as secure the border, fix the healthcare system, etc. Nothing was done in the 20 years since, and Trump will do nothing now. Trump won the Repugnant nod without having to release his tax records, his medical records (what he did release was a fraud), without having to bring his businesses back to the US ( and ignorant fools bought that garbage made in China by the tons), without having to prove anything, or even produce his "secret" plans for the budget, ISIS, etc.

Get out your crying towel idiot. You are in for a rough ride. Unfortunately, because of your stupidity so are the rest of us.

You still don't get it that Donald Trump is a winner.

You will learn, and you'll be happy about it...then again, maybe you won't.
 
You still don't get it that Donald Trump is a winner.

You will learn, and you'll be happy about it...then again, maybe you won't.


Define :winner: for me. In your little world I guess a "winner" is one who creates a phony "university" top cheat the gullible out of their money. A "winner" is one who hires a contractor at a set wage, and then refuses to pay so that the contractor has to take him to court where he then renegotiates the contract to screw the contractor out of his just fee. To you a "winner" is one who cheats on his wife. To you a "winner" is one who loses money, and then doesn't pay taxes for 20 years.

Yes, to you a "winner" is a lying, adulterous, coward, who fails to keep his word when it benefits him not to.

On fact, it is your form of lose, if they exist at all, morals that allows "winners" like Trump to control a country.
 
Define :winner: for me. In your little world I guess a "winner" is one who creates a phony "university" top cheat the gullible out of their money. A "winner" is one who hires a contractor at a set wage, and then refuses to pay so that the contractor has to take him to court where he then renegotiates the contract to screw the contractor out of his just fee. To you a "winner" is one who cheats on his wife. To you a "winner" is one who loses money, and then doesn't pay taxes for 20 years.

Yes, to you a "winner" is a lying, adulterous, coward, who fails to keep his word when it benefits him not to.

On fact, it is your form of lose, if they exist at all, morals that allows "winners" like Trump to control a country.

It's impossible to debate with insanity.

Best of luck to you in the asylum. I hope the nurse gives you an extra cookie today.
 
The big thing, as you know, is entitlement spending and the waste, fraud, and abuse that goes on there...that Donald Trump will clean up which will save the US taxpayers so many billions of dollars.
Dream on. Trump is already backing away from his campaign promises. He is also appointing industrial billionaires to his administration. Is that the sort of anti-establishment administration you dreamed of? Or maybe you are a billionaire and want that kind of administration.
 
Dream on. Trump is already backing away from his campaign promises. He is also appointing industrial billionaires to his administration. Is that the sort of anti-establishment administration you dreamed of? Or maybe you are a billionaire and want that kind of administration.
It's an issue that he gets successful guys to fix DC ? I think it's better that hiring his donor's friends.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top