A fake plane was added for south tower explosion

Status
Not open for further replies.
A great site right here. Check it out. http://desip.igc.org/NoPlanesOn911.html

Holmgren opines that it must have been embarrassing for the FBI when some of the hijackers began turning up alive and protesting their innocence. "And even more embarrassing when the passenger lists provided by the airlines did not contain a single Arabic name," and he details other related impossibilities, improbabilities and coincidences, including an admission by the FBI (later apparently effectively recanted) that "they actually had no idea who hijackers were." To this day, the FBI list of the 19 hijackers remains unchanged.

Among the reasons that Holmgren concludes that there weren’t any hijackings or hijackers was that in not one of the four alleged hijackings did any of the crew punch in the four digit hijacking code to alert Air Traffic Control. Holmgren also wonders why there was no distress call from Flight AA 11 (North Tower hit) when there was an alleged 25-minute standoff, including shooting and stabbing of passengers. Another anomaly from that alleged flight is that "the timeline of the alleged phone call indicates that the plane had already turned off course before the hijackers got into the cockpit."

Holmgren then deconstructs the "the South Tower strike – the second hit, the one shown live on TV" and acknowledges that superficially it certainly appears to be a large jet." Yet, he argues, "a close examination reveals that it is not a real plane." To support this assertion Holmgren provides a score of links to the work of researchers Rosalee Grable (aka Webfairy), Nico Haupt, Morgan Reynolds, Ivan Amato[20] and his own supporting articles.[21]

Holmgren finds that the plane shown on TV is not real because it "shows impossible physical characteristics and behavior." The argument that I find most convincing and easiest to understand is his claim that one can see in a frame-by-frame analysis that the alleged plane "passes through the wall like a ghost without making a hole and without breaking off any parts." Holmgren concludes that the plane is "simply a cartoon, which has been animated into the footage.

NY based researcher Vincent Sammartino claims that the government seems to have faked the number of plane victims and also faked the number who claimed victim compensation.[25] According to Sammartino, of the 266[26] official names of passengers and crew who were supposed to have died in the four passenger jets, only 52 names have appeared on the Social Security Death Index (SSDI), a privately owned website not affiliated with the Social Security Administration. According to Sammartino, of the 52 listed as dead in the SSDI, which has an accuracy rate of about 83%, only 11 of the family members have claimed victim compensation (not counting 9/11 plane crash widow, Ellen Mariani, who has pointedly refused compensation).
 
Werbung:

The 9/11 "truth" movement has dried up and blown away, having achieved none of its stated objectives or even bothering to get a single significant claim correct. See the "What's New" section below to get an idea of the type of people who still cling to kooky 9/11 delusions.

However, let's remember that 9/11 won't be the last major internet-age event about which people with agendas – whether they be government spokesmen or basement-dwelling crackpots – aggressively spread falsehoods. Unfortunately, falsehoods about the 9/11 attacks have their strongest foothold in Muslim countries (see poll results below), where this website has no effect.

-Mark Roberts

Some comments about Mark Roberts,

"The Obi-wan Kenobi of debunkers"Stephen Lemons, Phoenix New Times

"The Yoda of 9/11 reality...If this site is not to your liking, then you have melded with the ju-ju, and are beyond the enticements of reason.".–Physicist Manuel Garcia Jr.

The "most effective" opposition to the 9/11 truth movement––2007 truth movement poll

"He's betraying this country and humanity!"Jason Bermas of Loose Change

"An absolute demon."––Alex Jones, alt-media personality
 
I cannot believe you said that.
All you offer is faked computer graphics.
Are you an AlQuida operative?
They would love for us to hate and mistrust our gov.

Thats it isn't it?
Thats why you don't answer the question.
Thats why you post nonsense.

You work for the enemy.
Only an idiot would buy your brand of insanity.
Even the truthers know your posts are trash.
Not even the CT people buy your trash.
Thats why you been banned from so many forums.

I can believe you post and repeat constant blather.
All you offer is a fake belief that a giant horsefly was really a plane..
They love that you knowingly deny reality to cover for blatant government wrongdoing.

That's why you don't answer the question.
That's why you post nonsense.

You work for the enemy, which is willful ignorance.
Only uninformed idiots would buy your brand of insanity.
Everyone knows you are in denial and will not challenge reality.

You are a defeated jackass who knows nothing about 911. The no plane movement is real and scares the hell out of everyone who doesn't want the real truth coming out. I, will the be the one that takes 911 to the closest possible truth concerning flight 175, you can count on that.

Quick definitions from Macmillan (blather)

verb
▸to talk for a long time about something that is boring or not important more...
nounmore...
 
This is the clearest footage of the two opposing flight paths brought forth because of this little big thing called the information age. According to this work, this fake west plane path was never shown on TV after 911. The seven second sync is almost perfect. Advance to 4:58 and see for yourself how two plane paths make one fake black plane. The sacking of human ignorance is in motion.

two-flight-paths_h_GIFSoupcom.gif

wtctwopaths.jpg

SEPTEMBER CLUES 5/7 - YouTube
 
the whole truther idea falls apart when you get down to a few simple problems....Eye witness can't see Digitally added planes...

Everyone at the WTC has to be idits for them to plant all these bombs and no one notices...

Set Bombs...and then Crash planes into the building....because you know....Americans would not be pissed off enough if just a few planes hit...and the building did not fall?

It was a excuse to invade Afghanistan and Iraq...Ignoring that we already had reason to invade Afghanistan...the Cole, 2 Embassy Bombings, the First WTC bombing, and other attacks....And if we did it for Iraq...well you would think they would be smart enough to actually you know...make it look like they did it?

They claim there is no Plane wreckage at the Pentagon...only to ignore that there is...and then claim that its not the Jet they claimed...because you know they had someone just run into the flames with a jet engine to fake it...and no one noticed...

And it was really a missile...even though people saw it...people are retarded and don't know a 747 from a missile...and all the people on the plane that crashed into it...well clearly all fake people...so they got thousands of people to pretend they knew these people or where family...

Also Pull it means blow up a building...even though that actually does not mean that...But it sounds like it could...so thats good enough.

Steel does not melt at a the temps given ( even ignoring that they have shown Jet Fuel to be able to burn at much higher temps then they list) it ignores the fact that Metal does not have to melt to fail...only weaken...

Its a conspiracy of like 20,000 people all in on it...it must be!
 
If the 2nd plane was fake, why are there all those videos from further away showing civlians screaming like hell when the 2nd plane slammed into the tower?

If the plane was a computer generated fake, thousands of civilians standing around the WTC wouldn't have even bothered to react with screams and fear.9/11 Truth = Traitorous Lie of America Haters and you people better hope we never meet.

If the 2nd plane was real then why didn't it show up in two live clips that were nicely witnessed by two spooked women? You are a traitor and a servant to ignorance. No plane was in either live footage that survived and the orb was affixed to the bottom of this fake plane.

wtcfakewest.jpg

wtcwestorb.jpg

angle-orb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif
 
First, you won't convince the masses unless you can figure it all out and prove it. This little evidence you have about the non-existant planes is not going to amount to anything. Even if you are able to prove that to all of us, doubtful at best, you will never prove it to them. Do you not agree?

You mistakenly and arrogantly claim to know what people would believe.LOL You don't know what you're talking about. People believe what they can see, therefore the masses will believe Greer shot jfk and that no plane impacted the second tower. The fake plane in the footage doesn't even look real, unless you're just passing by, which is what happened to most americans on 911. Real researchers know it's fake.
 
So you're saying it's impossible to edit a plane out of a picture?
Or chopper lady is more reliable than all the people on the ground who saw a plane?

I'm not saying that but one women is confirming only an explosion and the other describes what might be a helicopter. That's as conclusive as you can get in this case with so much video fakery. Chopper lady is more reliable because we can hear her eyewitness account in real time as she's watching the towers before, during, and after the explosion.
 
And what is your proof that your videos aren't faked?

And why haven't you addressed my question about the radically different angles of approach in the two "orb" gifs you posted previously?

The live footage trumps the fake footage every time. The two orbs are slightly different in size, come in at different angles, but both from the west. I can't explain the differences but when those orbs are hidden behind the towers, the south tower explodes and in that they are 100% consistent. I'm going with the WB11 footage because of it's similar, straighter path of both wide views.

wb-orb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif

angle-orb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif
 
Final proof that two flight paths were aired on 911

The government's official flight path is the dive bomber which places the digi-plane above and behind/south of the towers before its steep dissention into the southeast corner of T2. Neither, the chopper 4 orb or WB11's mini-missile ever appear behind and above the towers. The chopper orb is the closest with it first being hidden just below the top of the southwest corner of T1. No plane morph or either orb from the west ever appeared anywhere near as high or south of the towers, in sight like the dive bomber. THIS SIMPLE PART OF THE 911 COVER-UP IS EXPOSED.

bbc-divebomb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif

angle-orb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif

wtcfakewestt.jpg

wide-orb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif

9/11 FOIA South Tower Strike and Witness "Another Plane Coming Down, See? .... Boom!" - YouTube
 
There were around 117 eyewitness accounts and only 20 percent saw a plane. Only 8% saw and heard a plane.

wtcwitnesses.jpg
 
Werbung:
Quote:
Originally Posted by yyy123
That's right... "The nose of digital plane is just an illusion...". It isn't real.
"If it had really went through there would be a hole.". Correct again.
The fact that 175 did hit the tower is undeniable... there is too much documentation & witness testimony supporting this. Therefore, the "nose" cannot actually be the "nose"... it must be something else. The logical conclusion is it is debris. You, SC and others are mis-interpreting the information presented and disregarding the rest.
There is no support or documentation of 'video fakery' to insert a plane into the crash scenario.


That's right... "The nose of the digital plane is just an illusion...". It isn't real.
"If it had really went through, there would be a hole.". Correct again.
The fact that 175 did NOT hit the tower is undeniable... there is too much documentation, live footage & witness testimony supporting this.

Therefore, the "nose" cannot actually be the "nose"... it must be something else. The logical conclusion is it's video fakery exposed by human error and a moving helicopter. You and other denialists are denying visually proven fakery presented from news fooatage because you can do nothing else but deny reality.

There is no support or documentation for any Black boeing 767 with no windows impacting tower 2...sorry.
nose-fake-out_h_GIFSoupcom.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top