Were We Told the Truth about WW2? continued

Status
Not open for further replies.

Scott

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Messages
188
I want to respond to the last post of this closed thread.
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/threads/were-we-told-the-truth-about-world-war-2.17111/

You might want to begin with the testimony of the Commandant of Auschwitz, Rudolph Hoess? He had nothing to gain by admitting to gassing and burning 2.5 million Jews. He freely admitted to doing that, and he was hung for his crimes, asking for God's forgiveness prior to his execution.

Check out this article.

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p389_Faurisson.html
(excerpt)
---------------------------------------------------------------
His confessions were false. They had been extorted from Höss by torture, but it took until 1983 to learn the identity of the torturers and the nature of the tortures they inflicted upon him.
---------------------------------------------------------------
 
Werbung:
At the 5:45 time mark of this video...
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Auschwitz+-+Why+The+Gas+Chambers+Are+A+Myth&sm=12

...it's said that the gas chamber doors were opened fifteen or twenty minutes after they were first closed and then they started dragging out the dead bodies.

According to this video that was an impossibility.
http://www.youtube.com/results?sear...+Probleme+Des+Chambres+a+Gaz+FRA+avec+ENG+SUB

It's explained again in this video.

Tehran Holocaust Conference 2006: Prof. Robert Faurisson - Victories of Revisionism - part 2/2

Start watching at the 4:55 time mark.
 
I don't think we were told the truth, there are a lot of problems with the official story we've been given and there was a lot of benefit to the Allies to paint Germany in as evil a light as possible. I also don't think that much of the denier material passes the smell test either. This topic is pointless to discuss because no matter where it takes place (except apparently for Tehran) it always turns into a large group of people saying that they believe the official story 100% and calling anyone who doesn't a Nazi sympathizer or apologist. To be fair sometimes that label does appear to have some merit but a mindless accusation is just that, mindless, even if it does happen to be true in that instance. Even a blind-folded dart thrower will hit the bulls eye once in awhile.

Suspending disbelief and the use of logic in order to feel comfortable with an opinion that may very well be flawed could also be referred to as denial. The only version of this that ever made any sense to me was the German version which was tossed out at Nuremberg for being politically inconvenient for the Allies. But, believe what you will, the war ended almost 70 years ago and it's probably too late for any productive revisiting of this issue.
 
Plot: A true-story account of a German businessman who saved more than 200,000 Chinese during the Nanjing massacre in 1937-38.

The IHR is a confirmed white nationalist group and the OP's article has no credibility. But not all Germans were mass murderers during the war and we know now that a number of Europeans set up the Nanking Safety Zone, by which up to 250,000 Chinese people were saved, while 50,000 to 60,000 civilians were killed during the Nanking massacre, according to John Rabe.
 
Werbung:
As it happens,.my dad's company made the first discovery of nazi concentration camps by the allies. Russia came across one a bit earlier. As he was the intel officer he got first look at what they discovered. He saw that Ike himself came immediately.
Its real alright.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top